230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26578078)
1. Consideration of multiple load cases is critical in modelling orthotropic bone adaptation in the femur.
Geraldes DM; Modenese L; Phillips AT
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Oct; 15(5):1029-42. PubMed ID: 26578078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of orthotropic and isotropic bone adaptation in the femur.
Geraldes DM; Phillips AT
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Sep; 30(9):873-89. PubMed ID: 24753477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Orthotropic bone remodelling around uncemented femoral implant: a comparison with isotropic formulation.
Mathai B; Dhara S; Gupta S
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Jun; 20(3):1115-1134. PubMed ID: 33768358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting the yield of the proximal femur using high-order finite-element analysis with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties.
Yosibash Z; Tal D; Trabelsi N
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2010 Jun; 368(1920):2707-23. PubMed ID: 20439270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur.
Wirtz DC; Pandorf T; Portheine F; Radermacher K; Schiffers N; Prescher A; Weichert D; Niethard FU
J Biomech; 2003 Feb; 36(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 12547369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trabecular bone adaptation with an orthotropic material model.
Miller Z; Fuchs MB; Arcan M
J Biomech; 2002 Feb; 35(2):247-56. PubMed ID: 11784543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of boundary conditions on computed apparent elastic properties of cancellous bone.
Pahr DH; Zysset PK
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Dec; 7(6):463-76. PubMed ID: 17972122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. European Society of Biomechanics S.M. Perren Award 2014: Safety factor of the proximal femur during gait: a population-based finite element study.
Taddei F; Palmadori I; Taylor WR; Heller MO; Bordini B; Toni A; Schileo E
J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3433-40. PubMed ID: 25280759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of micromotion initiation of an implanted femur under physiological loads and constraints using the finite element method.
Andreaus U; Colloca M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jul; 223(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 19623912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions.
Peng L; Bai J; Zeng X; Zhou Y
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16076560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy from stress tensors.
Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jan; 14(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 24777672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strain distribution within the human femur due to physiological and simplified loading: finite element analysis using the muscle standardized femur model.
Polgár K; Gill HS; Viceconti M; Murray DW; O'Connor JJ
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(3):173-89. PubMed ID: 12807158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental and finite element analysis of the mouse caudal vertebrae loading model: prediction of cortical and trabecular bone adaptation.
Webster D; Wirth A; van Lenthe GH; Müller R
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Jan; 11(1-2):221-30. PubMed ID: 21472383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation.
Bourne BC; van der Meulen MC
J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 15046990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions.
Baca V; Horak Z
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Oct; 29(8):935. PubMed ID: 17097326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physiologically based boundary conditions in finite element modelling.
Speirs AD; Heller MO; Duda GN; Taylor WR
J Biomech; 2007; 40(10):2318-23. PubMed ID: 17166504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relating age and micro-architecture with apparent-level elastic constants: a micro-finite element study of female cortical bone from the anterior femoral midshaft.
Donaldson FE; Pankaj P; Cooper DM; Thomas CD; Clement JG; Simpson AH
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jun; 225(6):585-96. PubMed ID: 22034742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models.
Weinans H; Sumner DR; Igloria R; Natarajan RN
J Biomech; 2000 Jul; 33(7):809-17. PubMed ID: 10831755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
