207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26578089)
1. National proficiency-gain curves for minimally invasive gastrointestinal cancer surgery.
Mackenzie H; Markar SR; Askari A; Ni M; Faiz O; Hanna GB
Br J Surg; 2016 Jan; 103(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 26578089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of procedural volume and proficiency gain on mortality from upper GI endoscopic mucosal resection.
Markar SR; Mackenzie H; Ni M; Huddy JR; Askari A; Faiz O; Griffin SM; Lovat L; Hanna GB
Gut; 2018 Jan; 67(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 27797934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in outcomes of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery across Europe.
Dikken JL; van Sandick JW; Allum WH; Johansson J; Jensen LS; Putter H; Coupland VH; Wouters MW; Lemmens VE; van de Velde CJ; van der Geest LG; Larsson HJ; Cats A; Verheij M
Br J Surg; 2013 Jan; 100(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 23180474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical Proficiency Gain and Survival After Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Markar SR; Mackenzie H; Lagergren P; Hanna GB; Lagergren J
J Clin Oncol; 2016 May; 34(13):1528-36. PubMed ID: 26951311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Performing major upper abdominal operations in a low-volume hospital: is it possible?].
Kiil J; Henneberg EW
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Apr; 168(15):1529-33. PubMed ID: 16640973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of time between procedures upon the proficiency gain period for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Markar SR; Ni M; Mackenzie H; Penna M; Faiz O; Hanna GB
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2703-2708. PubMed ID: 32314077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgeon Volume and Surgeon Age in Relation to Proficiency Gain Curves for Prognosis Following Surgery for Esophageal Cancer.
Gottlieb-Vedi E; Mackenzie H; van Workum F; Rosman C; Lagergren P; Markar S; Lagergren J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):497-505. PubMed ID: 30324469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional care in colonic and rectal surgery.
Keane C; Savage S; McFarlane K; Seigne R; Robertson G; Eglinton T
ANZ J Surg; 2012 Oct; 82(10):697-703. PubMed ID: 22882553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning Curve for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Sigmoid Colon Cancer.
Kim CW; Kim WR; Kim HY; Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Aug; 221(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 26070396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical team proficiency in minimally invasive esophagectomy is related to case volume and improves patient outcomes.
Okamura A; Watanabe M; Fukudome I; Yamashita K; Yuda M; Hayami M; Imamura Y; Mine S
Esophagus; 2018 Apr; 15(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 29892937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Successful and safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Dutch hospitals.
Kolfschoten NE; van Leersum NJ; Gooiker GA; Marang van de Mheen PJ; Eddes EH; Kievit J; Brand R; Tanis PJ; Bemelman WA; Tollenaar RA; Meijerink J; Wouters MW
Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):916-21. PubMed ID: 22735713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting morbidity after conversion of laparoscopic colorectal resections.
Aytac E; Stocchi L; Ozdemir Y; Kiran RP
Br J Surg; 2013 Nov; 100(12):1641-8. PubMed ID: 24264789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study.
Mamidanna R; Bottle A; Aylin P; Faiz O; Hanna GB
Ann Surg; 2012 Feb; 255(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 22173202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopically assisted vs. open elective colonic and rectal resection: a comparison of outcomes in English National Health Service Trusts between 1996 and 2006.
Faiz O; Warusavitarne J; Bottle A; Tekkis PP; Darzi AW; Kennedy RH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Oct; 52(10):1695-704. PubMed ID: 19966600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of national centralization of oesophagogastric cancer on management and clinical outcome from emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions.
Markar SR; Mackenzie H; Wiggins T; Askari A; Karthikesalingam A; Faiz O; Griffin SM; Birkmeyer JD; Hanna GB
Br J Surg; 2018 Jan; 105(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 29155448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England.
Lazzarino AI; Nagpal K; Bottle A; Faiz O; Moorthy K; Aylin P
Ann Surg; 2010 Aug; 252(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 20622666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical proficiency in hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery: determining how many cases are required to achieve mastery.
Pendlimari R; Holubar SD; Dozois EJ; Larson DW; Pemberton JH; Cima RR
Arch Surg; 2012 Apr; 147(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 22184135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving conventional recovery with enhanced recovery in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Khreiss W; Huebner M; Cima RR; Dozois ER; Chua HK; Pemberton JH; Harmsen WS; Larson DW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 May; 57(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 24819094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uptake and outcomes of laparoscopically assisted resection for colon and rectal cancer in Australia: a population-based study.
Dobbins TA; Young JM; Solomon MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Apr; 57(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 24608296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgeon Volume and Cancer Esophagectomy, Gastrectomy, and Pancreatectomy: A Population-based Study in England.
Mamidanna R; Ni Z; Anderson O; Spiegelhalter SD; Bottle A; Aylin P; Faiz O; Hanna GB
Ann Surg; 2016 Apr; 263(4):727-32. PubMed ID: 26501701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
