These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26578226)

  • 1. Risks and benefits of speech recognition for clinical documentation: a systematic review.
    Hodgson T; Coiera E
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Apr; 23(e1):e169-79. PubMed ID: 26578226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of radiology speech recognition reports in a multilingual South African teaching hospital.
    du Toit J; Hattingh R; Pitcher R
    BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Mar; 15():8. PubMed ID: 25879906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition for clinical documentation from 1990 to 2018: a systematic review.
    Blackley SV; Huynh J; Wang L; Korach Z; Zhou L
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Apr; 26(4):324-338. PubMed ID: 30753666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of Errors in Dictated Clinical Documents Assisted by Speech Recognition Software and Professional Transcriptionists.
    Zhou L; Blackley SV; Kowalski L; Doan R; Acker WW; Landman AB; Kontrient E; Mack D; Meteer M; Bates DW; Goss FR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jul; 1(3):e180530. PubMed ID: 30370424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition in the radiology department: a systematic review.
    Hammana I; Lepanto L; Poder T; Bellemare C; Ly MS
    Health Inf Manag; 2015; 44(2):4-10. PubMed ID: 26157081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency and spectrum of errors in final radiology reports generated with automatic speech recognition technology.
    Quint LE; Quint DJ; Myles JD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Dec; 5(12):1196-9. PubMed ID: 19027683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency and analysis of non-clinical errors made in radiology reports using the National Integrated Medical Imaging System voice recognition dictation software.
    Motyer RE; Liddy S; Torreggiani WC; Buckley O
    Ir J Med Sci; 2016 Nov; 185(4):921-927. PubMed ID: 27696148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinician survey of using speech recognition for clinical documentation in the electronic health record.
    Goss FR; Blackley SV; Ortega CA; Kowalski LT; Landman AB; Lin CT; Meteer M; Bakes S; Gradwohl SC; Bates DW; Zhou L
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Oct; 130():103938. PubMed ID: 31442847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physician use of speech recognition versus typing in clinical documentation: A controlled observational study.
    Blackley SV; Schubert VD; Goss FR; Al Assad W; Garabedian PM; Zhou L
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Sep; 141():104178. PubMed ID: 32521449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech Recognition for Medical Dictation: Overview in Quebec and Systematic Review.
    Poder TG; Fisette JF; Déry V
    J Med Syst; 2018 Apr; 42(5):89. PubMed ID: 29610981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting: advantages, disadvantages, and impact.
    Ramaswamy MR; Chaljub G; Esch O; Fanning DD; vanSonnenberg E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar; 174(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 10701598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of voice recognition software on comparative error rates in radiology reports.
    McGurk S; Brauer K; Macfarlane TV; Duncan KA
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):767-70. PubMed ID: 18628322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Machine learning-based speech recognition system for nursing documentation - A pilot study.
    Lee TY; Li CC; Chou KR; Chung MH; Hsiao ST; Guo SL; Hung LY; Wu HT
    Int J Med Inform; 2023 Oct; 178():105213. PubMed ID: 37690224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voice recognition for radiology reporting: is it good enough?
    Rana DS; Hurst G; Shepstone L; Pilling J; Cockburn J; Crawford M
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Nov; 60(11):1205-12. PubMed ID: 16223617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prepopulated radiology report templates: a prospective analysis of error rate and turnaround time.
    Hawkins CM; Hall S; Hardin J; Salisbury S; Towbin AJ
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Aug; 25(4):504-11. PubMed ID: 22270786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Impact of a PACS/RIS-integrated speech recognition system on radiology reporting time and report availability].
    Trumm CG; Glaser C; Paasche V; Crispin A; Popp P; Küttner B; Francke M; Nissen-Meyer S; Reiser M
    Rofo; 2006 Apr; 178(4):400-9. PubMed ID: 16607588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re: "frequency and spectrum of errors in final radiology reports generated with automatic speech recognition technology".
    Janower ML
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jul; 6(7):536; reply 536-7. PubMed ID: 19560078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Re: "frequency and spectrum of errors in final radiology reports generated with automatic speech recognition technology".
    Branstetter BF; Shrestha RB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jul; 6(7):535-6; reply 536-7. PubMed ID: 19560076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re: "Frequency and spectrum of errors in final radiology reports generated with automatic speech recognition technology".
    Marcovici PA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Apr; 6(4):282-3; author reply 283. PubMed ID: 19327665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the utility of speech recognition through error detection.
    Voll K; Atkins S; Forster B
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Dec; 21(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 17387554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.