269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26579022)
21. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Blame, not ability, impacts moral "ought" judgments for impossible actions: Toward an empirical refutation of "ought" implies "can".
Chituc V; Henne P; Sinnott-Armstrong W; De Brigard F
Cognition; 2016 May; 150():20-5. PubMed ID: 26848732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intuitive Probabilities and the Limitation of Moral Imagination.
Ryazanov AA; Knutzen J; Rickless SC; Christenfeld NJS; Nelkin DK
Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42 Suppl 1():38-68. PubMed ID: 29451322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Emotional and Utilitarian Appraisals of Moral Dilemmas Are Encoded in Separate Areas and Integrated in Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex.
Hutcherson CA; Montaser-Kouhsari L; Woodward J; Rangel A
J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(36):12593-605. PubMed ID: 26354924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The extended Moral Foundations Dictionary (eMFD): Development and applications of a crowd-sourced approach to extracting moral intuitions from text.
Hopp FR; Fisher JT; Cornell D; Huskey R; Weber R
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):232-246. PubMed ID: 32666393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Weighing outcome vs. intent across societies: How cultural models of mind shape moral reasoning.
McNamara RA; Willard AK; Norenzayan A; Henrich J
Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():95-108. PubMed ID: 30227333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Individual differences in moral judgment competence are related to activity of the prefrontal cortex when attributing blame to evil intention.
Li X; Yang J; Li P; Li H
Soc Neurosci; 2016; 11(4):438-48. PubMed ID: 26569419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. People systematically update moral judgments of blame.
Monroe AE; Malle BF
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Feb; 116(2):215-236. PubMed ID: 30359071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Moral learning as intuitive theory revision.
Rhodes M; Wellman H
Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():191-200. PubMed ID: 27613004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Enough skill to kill: intentionality judgments and the moral valence of action.
Guglielmo S; Malle BF
Cognition; 2010 Nov; 117(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 20813355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Your visual system provides all the information you need to make moral judgments about generic visual events.
De Freitas J; Alvarez GA
Cognition; 2018 Sep; 178():133-146. PubMed ID: 29852427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hunger Bias or Gut Instinct? Responses to Judgments of Harm Depending on Visceral State Versus Intuitive Decision-Making.
Brown H; Proulx MJ; Stanton Fraser D
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2261. PubMed ID: 33041900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reasoning, cognitive control, and moral intuition.
Patterson R; Rothstein J; Barbey AK
Front Integr Neurosci; 2012; 6():114. PubMed ID: 23264763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Emotion and moral judgment.
Avramova YR; Inbar Y
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2013 Mar; 4(2):169-178. PubMed ID: 26304193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cold Side-Effect Effect: Affect Does Not Mediate the Influence of Moral Considerations in Intentionality Judgments.
Díaz R; Viciana H; Gomila A
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():295. PubMed ID: 28293211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The role of emotion regulation in moral judgment.
Helion C; Ochsner KN
Neuroethics; 2018 Oct; 11(3):297-308. PubMed ID: 30416611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of emotions for moral judgments depends on the type of emotion and moral scenario.
Ugazio G; Lamm C; Singer T
Emotion; 2012 Jun; 12(3):579-90. PubMed ID: 21859189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.
Guglielmo S
Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():334-337. PubMed ID: 28803616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Unifying morality's influence on non-moral judgments: The relevance of alternative possibilities.
Phillips J; Luguri JB; Knobe J
Cognition; 2015 Dec; 145():30-42. PubMed ID: 26298424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Can model-free reinforcement learning explain deontological moral judgments?
Ayars A
Cognition; 2016 May; 150():232-42. PubMed ID: 26918742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
