127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26579563)
1. Effect of Radiofrequency Transmit Field Correction on Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast at 3.0 T.
Bedair R; Graves MJ; Patterson AJ; McLean MA; Manavaki R; Wallace T; Reid S; Mendichovszky I; Griffiths J; Gilbert FJ
Radiology; 2016 May; 279(2):368-77. PubMed ID: 26579563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. B
Tsai WC; Kao KJ; Chang KM; Hung CF; Yang Q; Lin CE; Chen CM
Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 27479805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An imaging protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI with 3.0T: using sagittal sequence interleaved between axial sequences.
Park JE; Lee JE; Hwang JY; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2013 Jul; 54(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 23486561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast MR imaging at 3 T with dual-source radiofrequency transmission offers superior B1 homogeneity: an intraindividual comparison with breast MR imaging at 1.5 T.
Trop I; Gilbert G; Ivancevic MK; Beaudoin G
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):602-8. PubMed ID: 23401582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transmit B1+ field inhomogeneity and T1 estimation errors in breast DCE-MRI at 3 tesla.
Sung K; Daniel BL; Hargreaves BA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):454-9. PubMed ID: 23292822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary human breast adenocarcinoma: imaging and histologic correlates of intrinsic susceptibility-weighted MR imaging before and during chemotherapy.
Li SP; Taylor NJ; Makris A; Ah-See ML; Beresford MJ; Stirling JJ; d'Arcy JA; Collins DJ; Padhani AR
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):643-52. PubMed ID: 20858850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The lactating breast: contrast-enhanced MR imaging of normal tissue and cancer.
Espinosa LA; Daniel BL; Vidarsson L; Zakhour M; Ikeda DM; Herfkens RJ
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 16244250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tumoral and nontumoral pancreas: correlation between quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and histopathologic parameters.
Bali MA; Metens T; Denolin V; Delhaye M; Demetter P; Closset J; Matos C
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):456-66. PubMed ID: 21852570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience.
Kuhl CK; Jost P; Morakkabati N; Zivanovic O; Schild HH; Gieseke J
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):666-76. PubMed ID: 16549623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Normal breast parenchyma: contrast enhancement kinetics at dynamic MR mammography--influence of anthropometric measures and menopausal status.
Hegenscheid K; Schmidt CO; Seipel R; Laqua R; Ohlinger R; Kühn JP; Hosten N; Puls R
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 23023963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous measurement of T
Zhang J; Winters K; Reynaud O; Kim SG
NMR Biomed; 2017 Sep; 30(9):. PubMed ID: 28544159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer: early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using parametric response maps for MR imaging.
Cho N; Im SA; Park IA; Lee KH; Li M; Han W; Noh DY; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):385-96. PubMed ID: 24738612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Background parenchymal signal enhancement ratio at preoperative MR imaging: association with subsequent local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after breast conservation surgery.
Kim SA; Cho N; Ryu EB; Seo M; Bae MS; Chang JM; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):699-707. PubMed ID: 24126372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between numeric gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI ratios and prognostic factors and histologic type of breast carcinoma.
Narisada H; Aoki T; Sasaguri T; Hashimoto H; Konishi T; Morita M; Korogi Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 16861530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach.
Fischer U; Kopka L; Grabbe E
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):881-8. PubMed ID: 10580970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive enhancement integral values in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast carcinoma: ductal carcinoma in situ vs. invasive ductal carcinoma.
Nadrljanski M; Maksimović R; Plešinac-Karapandžić V; Nikitović M; Marković-Vasiljković B; Milošević Z
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1363-7. PubMed ID: 24894697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Liver: segment-specific analysis of B1 field homogeneity at 3.0-T MR imaging with single-source versus dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation.
Pazahr S; Fischer MA; Chuck N; Luechinger R; Schick F; Nanz D; Boss A
Radiology; 2012 Nov; 265(2):591-9. PubMed ID: 22929333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bilateral diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast tumors with submillimeter resolution using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 7 T.
Bogner W; Pinker K; Zaric O; Baltzer P; Minarikova L; Porter D; Bago-Horvath Z; Dubsky P; Helbich TH; Trattnig S; Gruber S
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 25341078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to predict survival in patients with primary breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Li SP; Makris A; Beresford MJ; Taylor NJ; Ah-See ML; Stirling JJ; d'Arcy JA; Collins DJ; Kozarski R; Padhani AR
Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 21502383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
