BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26579772)

  • 1. Potential Application of Alchemical Free Energy Simulations to Discriminate GPCR Ligand Efficacy.
    Lee HS; Seok C; Im W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Mar; 11(3):1255-66. PubMed ID: 26579772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design of Drug Efficacy Guided by Free Energy Simulations of the β
    Panel N; Vo DD; Kahlous NA; Hübner H; Tiedt S; Matricon P; Pacalon J; Fleetwood O; Kampen S; Luttens A; Delemotte L; Kihlberg J; Gmeiner P; Carlsson J
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2023 May; 62(22):e202218959. PubMed ID: 36914577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structure-Based Prediction of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Ligand Function: A β-Adrenoceptor Case Study.
    Kooistra AJ; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 May; 55(5):1045-61. PubMed ID: 25848966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular dynamics simulations of the effect of the G-protein and diffusible ligands on the β2-adrenergic receptor.
    Goetz A; Lanig H; Gmeiner P; Clark T
    J Mol Biol; 2011 Dec; 414(4):611-23. PubMed ID: 22037586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural basis for ligand binding and specificity in adrenergic receptors: implications for GPCR-targeted drug discovery.
    Huber T; Menon S; Sakmar TP
    Biochemistry; 2008 Oct; 47(42):11013-23. PubMed ID: 18821775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereoselective binding of agonists to the β
    Plazinska A; Plazinski W
    Mol Biosyst; 2017 May; 13(5):910-920. PubMed ID: 28338133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DIRECT-ID: An automated method to identify and quantify conformational variations--application to β2 -adrenergic GPCR.
    Lakkaraju SK; Lemkul JA; Huang J; MacKerell AD
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Feb; 37(4):416-25. PubMed ID: 26558323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding the effects on constitutive activation and drug binding of a D130N mutation in the β2 adrenergic receptor via molecular dynamics simulation.
    Zhu Y; Yuan Y; Xiao X; Zhang L; Guo Y; Pu X
    J Mol Model; 2014 Nov; 20(11):2491. PubMed ID: 25342155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conformational and Thermodynamic Landscape of GPCR Activation from Theory and Computation.
    Dong SS; Goddard WA; Abrol R
    Biophys J; 2016 Jun; 110(12):2618-2629. PubMed ID: 27332120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Insights into the role of Asp79(2.50) in β2 adrenergic receptor activation from molecular dynamics simulations.
    Ranganathan A; Dror RO; Carlsson J
    Biochemistry; 2014 Nov; 53(46):7283-96. PubMed ID: 25347607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ligand-binding affinity of alternative conformers of human β
    Dilcan G; Doruker P; Akten ED
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2019 May; 93(5):883-899. PubMed ID: 30637937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing clinically relevant natural variants of GPCRs using computational approaches.
    Sengupta D; Sonar K; Joshi M
    Methods Cell Biol; 2017; 142():187-204. PubMed ID: 28964336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mapping the functional binding sites of cholesterol in β2-adrenergic receptor by long-time molecular dynamics simulations.
    Cang X; Du Y; Mao Y; Wang Y; Yang H; Jiang H
    J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jan; 117(4):1085-94. PubMed ID: 23298417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Search for β2 adrenergic receptor ligands by virtual screening via grid computing and investigation of binding modes by docking and molecular dynamics simulations.
    Bai Q; Shao Y; Pan D; Zhang Y; Liu H; Yao X
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107837. PubMed ID: 25229694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dynamic process of β(2)-adrenergic receptor activation.
    Nygaard R; Zou Y; Dror RO; Mildorf TJ; Arlow DH; Manglik A; Pan AC; Liu CW; Fung JJ; Bokoch MP; Thian FS; Kobilka TS; Shaw DE; Mueller L; Prosser RS; Kobilka BK
    Cell; 2013 Jan; 152(3):532-42. PubMed ID: 23374348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast, metadynamics-based method for prediction of the stereochemistry-dependent relative free energies of ligand-receptor interactions.
    Plazinska A; Plazinski W; Jozwiak K
    J Comput Chem; 2014 Apr; 35(11):876-82. PubMed ID: 24615679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences between G-Protein-Stabilized Agonist-GPCR Complexes and their Nanobody-Stabilized Equivalents.
    Saleh N; Ibrahim P; Clark T
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2017 Jul; 56(31):9008-9012. PubMed ID: 28481446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mapping functional group free energy patterns at protein occluded sites: nuclear receptors and G-protein coupled receptors.
    Lakkaraju SK; Yu W; Raman EP; Hershfeld AV; Fang L; Deshpande DA; MacKerell AD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Mar; 55(3):700-8. PubMed ID: 25692383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling GPCR active state conformations: the β(2)-adrenergic receptor.
    Simpson LM; Wall ID; Blaney FE; Reynolds CA
    Proteins; 2011 May; 79(5):1441-57. PubMed ID: 21337626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molecular modelling of human 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor (5-HT2A) and virtual screening studies towards the identification of agonist and antagonist molecules.
    Gandhimathi A; Sowdhamini R
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2016 May; 34(5):952-70. PubMed ID: 26327576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.