BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26580271)

  • 1. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of an Affordable Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Rubio M; Hernández CS; Seco E; Perez-Merino P; Casares I; Dave SR; Lim D; Durr NJ; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):726-732. PubMed ID: 31592955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children.
    Gil A; Hernández CS; Pérez-Merino P; Rubio M; Velarde G; Abellanas-Lodares M; Román-Daza Á; Alejandre N; Jiménez-Alfaro I; Casares I; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240933. PubMed ID: 33112912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of refractive value and pupil size under monocular and binocular conditions between the Spot Vision Screener and binocular open-field autorefractor.
    Satou T; Takahashi Y; Niida T
    Strabismus; 2020 Dec; 28(4):186-193. PubMed ID: 33063575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measured with three different models of autorefractors.
    Gwiazda J; Weber C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jan; 81(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 14747762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA; Campbell CE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.
    Hernández CS; Gil A; Zaytouny A; Casares I; Poderoso J; de Lara A; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E; Alejandre-Alba N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 38084770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
    Altoaimi BH; Kollbaum P; Meyer D; Bradley A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the Accuracy and Repeatability of Refractive Error Estimates Depend on the Measurement Principle of Autorefractors?
    Padhy D; Bharadwaj SR; Nayak S; Rath S; Das T
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 33505769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of the handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor, and subjective refraction in Singapore adults.
    Farook M; Venkatramani J; Gazzard G; Cheng A; Tan D; Saw SM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1066-70. PubMed ID: 16357649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a Portable Wavefront Aberrometer for Community Screening Refraction in the Elderly.
    Plum W; Varadaraj V; Dosto N; Thompson SL; Gajwani P; Friedman DS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Mar; 98(3):289-294. PubMed ID: 33633020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the SVOne: A Handheld, Smartphone-Based Autorefractor.
    Ciuffreda KJ; Rosenfield M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1133-9. PubMed ID: 26540478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of six different autorefractor designs on the precision and accuracy of refractive error measurement.
    Venkataraman AP; Brautaset R; Domínguez-Vicent A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0278269. PubMed ID: 36441778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and reproducibility of a handheld videorefractor.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almaliki WH; AlQarni A; Osuagwu UL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):632-41. PubMed ID: 25822015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repeatability and Validity of Peripheral Refraction with Two Different Autorefractors.
    Morrison AM; Mutti DO
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Jun; 97(6):429-439. PubMed ID: 32511165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements.
    Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction.
    Nguyen MT; Berntsen DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):886-893. PubMed ID: 28727613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.