These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26580271)

  • 21. Open versus closed view autorefraction in young adults.
    Nagra M; Akhtar A; Huntjens B; Campbell P
    J Optom; 2021; 14(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 32792330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.
    Bennett JR; Stalboerger GM; Hodge DO; Schornack MM
    J Optom; 2015; 8(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25498534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical Evaluation Of a 0.05 D-step Binocular Wavefront Optometer in Young Adults in China.
    Cheng M; Chen X; Lei Y; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Zhou X; Wang X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2024 May; 107(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 36794379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy and accommodation capability of a handheld autorefractor.
    Wesemann W; Dick B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Jan; 26(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 10646148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of refraction using a handheld wavefront autorefractor in young and adult patients.
    Schimitzek T; Wesemann W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Sep; 28(9):1655-66. PubMed ID: 12231328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of a Smartphone-based Autorefractor Compared with Criterion-standard Refraction.
    Jeganathan VSE; Valikodath N; Niziol LM; Hansen S; Apostolou H; Woodward MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1135-1141. PubMed ID: 30451804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of refractive error measures by the IRX3 aberrometer and autorefraction.
    McCullough SJ; Little JA; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1183-90. PubMed ID: 25192432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigation of the Accuracy of a Low-Cost, Portable Autorefractor to Provide Well-Tolerated Eyeglass Prescriptions: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Joseph S; Varadaraj V; Dave SR; Lage E; Lim D; Aziz K; Dudgeon S; Ravilla TD; Friedman DS
    Ophthalmology; 2021 Dec; 128(12):1672-1680. PubMed ID: 34111444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data.
    Hernández CS; Gil A; Casares I; Poderoso J; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Sánchez-Montañés M; Lage E
    J Optom; 2022; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S22-S31. PubMed ID: 35431181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wavefront analyzers induce instrument myopia.
    Cervino A; Hosking SL; Rai GK; Naroo SA; Gilmartin B
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 22(8):795-803. PubMed ID: 17061717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor.
    Davies LN; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Apr; 80(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 12692490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of multifocal contact lens over-refraction using an infrared, open-field autorefractor: A preliminary study.
    Giner A; Aldaba M; Arjona M; Vilaseca M; Pujol J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 25907202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study.
    Rao DP; Negiloni K; Gurunathan S; Velkumar S; Sivaraman A; Baig AU; Kumari B; Murali K
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):498. PubMed ID: 36536321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Examination of preschool children for refractive errors. First experience using a handheld autorefractor].
    Büchner TF; Schnorbus U; Grenzebach UH; Stupp T; Busse H
    Ophthalmologe; 2003 Nov; 100(11):971-8. PubMed ID: 14669034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of the Topcon BV-1000 automated subjective refraction system.
    Dave T; Fukuma Y
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 15181357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantification of refractive error: comparison of autorefractor and focometer.
    du Toit R; Soong K; Brian G; Ramke J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):582-8. PubMed ID: 16909083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of refractive error measurements by three different models of autorefractors and subjective refraction in young adults.
    Wosik J; Patrzykont M; Pniewski J
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):B1-B6. PubMed ID: 31044948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.