These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26580309)

  • 1. Practical session assessments in human anatomy: Weightings and performance.
    McDonald AC; Chan SP; Schuijers JA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 26580309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.
    Meyer AJ; Innes SI; Stomski NJ; Armson AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 25981194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissection and dissection-associated required experiences improve student performance in gross anatomy: Differences among quartiles.
    Pizzimenti MA; Pantazis N; Sandra A; Hoffmann DS; Lenoch S; Ferguson KJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 May; 9(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 26536279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Student performance in and perceptions of a high structure undergraduate human anatomy course.
    Shaffer JF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):516-528. PubMed ID: 26990231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association between learning style preferences and anatomy assessment outcomes in graduate-entry and undergraduate medical students.
    O'Mahony SM; Sbayeh A; Horgan M; O'Flynn S; O'Tuathaigh CM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 26845590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
    Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Puzzle-based versus traditional lecture: comparing the effects of pedagogy on academic performance in an undergraduate human anatomy and physiology II lab.
    Stetzik L; Deeter A; Parker J; Yukech C
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 15():107. PubMed ID: 26100835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of anatomical knowledge by practical examinations: The effect of question design on student performance.
    Sagoo MG; Smith CF; Gosden E
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 26840187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do collaborative practical tests encourage student-centered active learning of gross anatomy?
    Green RA; Cates T; White L; Farchione D
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 May; 9(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 26415089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose- and time-dependent benefits of iPad technology in an undergraduate human anatomy course.
    Raney MA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):367-77. PubMed ID: 26606529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using generalizability analysis to estimate parameters for anatomy assessments: A multi-institutional study.
    Byram JN; Seifert MF; Brooks WS; Fraser-Cotlin L; Thorp LE; Williams JM; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 27458988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independent learning modules enhance student performance and understanding of anatomy.
    Serrat MA; Dom AM; Buchanan JT; Williams AR; Efaw ML; Richardson LL
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(5):406-16. PubMed ID: 24616425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using collaborative two-stage examinations to address test anxiety in a large enrollment gateway course.
    Fournier KA; Couret J; Ramsay JB; Caulkins JL
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):409-422. PubMed ID: 28135034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
    Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?
    Mogali SR; Rotgans JI; Rosby L; Ferenczi MA; Low Beer N
    Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 13(5):581-590. PubMed ID: 31733172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Group in-course assessment promotes cooperative learning and increases performance.
    Pratten MK; Merrick D; Burr SA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 24039224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A scoring framework for assessing anatomy competence of undergraduate preclinical students.
    Raubenheimer D; Raubenheimer JE; van Zyl S
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 26588194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can anatomists teach living anatomy using ultrasound as a teaching tool?
    Jurjus RA; Dimorier K; Brown K; Slaby F; Shokoohi H; Boniface K; Liu YT
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(5):340-9. PubMed ID: 24327576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of clinical skill lab on students' learning in preclinical years.
    Ali L; Nisar S; Ghassan A; Khan SA
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2011; 23(4):114-7. PubMed ID: 23472431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does attendance at anatomy practical classes correlate with assessment outcome? A retrospective study of a large cohort of undergraduate anatomy students.
    Gonsalvez DG; Ovens M; Ivanusic J
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Dec; 15():231. PubMed ID: 26698839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.