126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26580684)
21. A nonconvex model-based combined geometric calibration scheme for micro cone-beam CT with irregular trajectories.
Li G; Chen X; You C; Huang X; Deng Z; Luo S
Med Phys; 2023 May; 50(5):2759-2774. PubMed ID: 36718546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Panoramic cone beam computed tomography.
Chang J; Zhou L; Wang S; Clifford Chao KS
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2930-46. PubMed ID: 22559664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Simultaneous calibration phantom commission and geometry calibration in cone beam CT.
Xu Y; Yang S; Ma J; Li B; Wu S; Qi H; Zhou L
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):N375-N390. PubMed ID: 28791961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The geometric calibration of cone-beam systems with arbitrary geometry.
Robert N; Watt KN; Wang X; Mainprize JG
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):7239-61. PubMed ID: 19926916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fully 3D geometrical calibration for an X-ray grating-based imaging system.
Chen M; Yang Q; Cong W; Wei B; Wang G
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 24(6):821-836. PubMed ID: 27612047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A line fiducial method for geometric calibration of cone-beam CT systems with diverse scan trajectories.
Jacobson MW; Ketcha MD; Capostagno S; Martin A; Uneri A; Goerres J; De Silva T; Reaungamornrat S; Han R; Manbachi A; Stayman JW; Vogt S; Kleinszig G; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025030. PubMed ID: 29116058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Physical performance and image optimization of megavoltage cone-beam CT.
Morin O; Aubry JF; Aubin M; Chen J; Descovich M; Hashemi AB; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1421-32. PubMed ID: 19472649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Projection Quality-Driven Tube Current Modulation Method in Cone-Beam CT for IGRT: Proof of Concept.
Men K; Dai J
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 16(6):1179-1186. PubMed ID: 29332447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient-specific scatter correction for flat-panel detector-based cone-beam CT imaging.
Zhao W; Brunner S; Niu K; Schafer S; Royalty K; Chen GH
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 60(3):1339-65. PubMed ID: 25592249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Scatter correction in cone-beam CT via a half beam blocker technique allowing simultaneous acquisition of scatter and image information.
Lee H; Xing L; Lee R; Fahimian BP
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2386-95. PubMed ID: 22559608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Local filtration based scatter correction for cone-beam CT using primary modulation.
Zhu L
Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):6199. PubMed ID: 27806607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Geometric Parameters Estimation and Calibration in Cone-Beam Micro-CT.
Zhao J; Hu X; Zou J; Hu X
Sensors (Basel); 2015 Sep; 15(9):22811-25. PubMed ID: 26371008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Scatter correction for cone-beam computed tomography using moving blocker strips: a preliminary study.
Wang J; Mao W; Solberg T
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5792-800. PubMed ID: 21158291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Geometric misalignment and calibration in cone-beam tomography.
von Smekal L; Kachelriess M; Stepina E; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3242-66. PubMed ID: 15651608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patient-specific calibration of cone-beam computed tomography data sets for radiotherapy dose calculations and treatment plan assessment.
MacFarlane M; Wong D; Hoover DA; Wong E; Johnson C; Battista JJ; Chen JZ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 29479821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of robustness of maximum likelihood cone-beam CT reconstruction with total variation regularization.
Stsepankou D; Arns A; Ng SK; Zygmanski P; Hesser J
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(19):5955-70. PubMed ID: 22964760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Common-mask guided image reconstruction (c-MGIR) for enhanced 4D cone-beam computed tomography.
Park JC; Zhang H; Chen Y; Fan Q; Li JG; Liu C; Lu B
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9157-83. PubMed ID: 26562284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Geometric parameters sensitivity evaluation based on projection trajectories for X-ray cone-beam computed laminography.
Sun Y; Han Y; Tan S; Xi X; Li L; Yan B; Zhang Y
J Xray Sci Technol; 2023; 31(2):423-434. PubMed ID: 36776029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Data correlation based noise level estimation for cone beam projection data.
Bai T; Yan H; Ouyang L; Staub D; Wang J; Jia X; Jiang SB; Mou X
J Xray Sci Technol; 2017; 25(6):907-926. PubMed ID: 28697578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Analysis of image quality and dose calculation accuracy in cone beam CT acquisitions with limited projection data (half scan, half fan) with regard to usability for adaptive radiation therapy treatment planning].
Kowatsch M; Winkler P; Zurl B; Konrad T; Schröttner J
Z Med Phys; 2011; 21(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 20888201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
