BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26581319)

  • 1. Can old-world and new-world monkeys judge spatial above/below relations to be the same or different? Some of them, but not all of them.
    Thompson RK; Flemming TM; Hagmann CE
    Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():74-83. PubMed ID: 26581319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conceptual thresholds for same and different in old-(Macaca mulatta) and new-world (Cebus apella) monkeys.
    Flemming TM
    Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 21238555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What meaning means for same and different: Analogical reasoning in humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Flemming TM; Beran MJ; Thompson RK; Kleider HM; Washburn DA
    J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 18489233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Same/different concept learning by capuchin monkeys in matching-to-sample tasks.
    Truppa V; Piano Mortari E; Garofoli D; Privitera S; Visalberghi E
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23809. PubMed ID: 21858225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analogical reasoning and the differential outcome effect: transitory bridging of the conceptual gap for rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Flemming TM; Thompson RK; Beran MJ; Washburn DA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jul; 37(3):353-60. PubMed ID: 21574737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analogical reasoning in a capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).
    Kennedy EH; Fragaszy DM
    J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 18489232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generalized relational matching by guinea baboons (Papio papio) in two-by-two-item analogy problems.
    Fagot J; Thompson RK
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1304-9. PubMed ID: 21934135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abstract-concept learning and list-memory processing by capuchin and rhesus monkeys.
    Wright AA; Rivera JJ; Katz JS; Bachevalier J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jul; 29(3):184-98. PubMed ID: 12884678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task switching in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) during computerized categorization tasks.
    Smith TR; Beran MJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(3):229-246. PubMed ID: 29847983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relational spatial reasoning by a nonhuman: the example of capuchin monkeys.
    Fragaszy DM; Cummins-Sebree SE
    Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev; 2005 Dec; 4(4):282-306. PubMed ID: 16585801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relational matching in baboons (Papio papio) with reduced grouping requirements.
    Fagot J; Parron C
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):184-93. PubMed ID: 20384399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Looking ahead? Computerized maze task performance by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), and human children (Homo sapiens).
    Beran MJ; Parrish AE; Futch SE; Evans TA; Perdue BM
    J Comp Psychol; 2015 May; 129(2):160-73. PubMed ID: 25798793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) relational matching: playing by their own (analogical) rules.
    Flemming TM; Kennedy EH
    J Comp Psychol; 2011 May; 125(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 21604854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Parrish AE; Brosnan SF; Beran MJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):395-405. PubMed ID: 26322505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Personality structure in brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella): comparisons with chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), orangutans (Pongo spp.), and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).
    Morton FB; Lee PC; Buchanan-Smith HM; Brosnan SF; Thierry B; Paukner A; de Waal FB; Widness J; Essler JL; Weiss A
    J Comp Psychol; 2013 Aug; 127(3):282-98. PubMed ID: 23668695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disconnect in concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): judgment of relations and relations-between-relations.
    Flemming TM; Beran MJ; Washburn DA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jan; 33(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 17227195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use?
    Fujita K; Kuroshima H; Asai S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jul; 29(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 12884682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequential responding and planning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Beran MJ; Parrish AE
    Anim Cogn; 2012 Nov; 15(6):1085-94. PubMed ID: 22801861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ordinal representation of numeric quantities by brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Judge PG; Evans TA; Vyas DK
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jan; 31(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 15656729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do primates see the solitaire illusion differently? A comparative assessment of humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Agrillo C; Parrish AE; Beran MJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2014 Nov; 128(4):402-13. PubMed ID: 25133464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.