These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26581456)

  • 1. Surface Texture and Optical Properties of Self-Adhering Composite Materials after Toothbrush Abrasion.
    Malavasi CV; Macedo EM; Souza Kda C; Rego GF; Schneider LF; Cavalcante LM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Oct; 16(10):775-82. PubMed ID: 26581456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface properties and color stability of dental flowable composites influenced by simulated toothbrushing.
    Lai G; Zhao L; Wang J; Kunzelmann KH
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Sep; 37(5):717-724. PubMed ID: 29998939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Isolated effect of filler particle size on surface properties of experimental resin composites before and after toothbrush abrasion.
    Kobayashi M; Koi K; Wiskoski S; Watanabe H; Lewis S; Ferracane JL
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1286-1292. PubMed ID: 37449726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test.
    Wang L; Garcia FC; Amarante de Araújo P; Franco EB; Mondelli RF
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(5):303-14; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 15726799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of nanofillers' size on surface properties after toothbrush abrasion.
    Cavalcante LM; Masouras K; Watts DC; Pimenta LA; Silikas N
    Am J Dent; 2009 Feb; 22(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19281115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface roughness and gloss alteration of polished resin composites with various filler types after simulated toothbrush abrasion.
    Yu P; Yang SM; Xu YX; Wang XY
    J Dent Sci; 2023 Jul; 18(3):1016-1022. PubMed ID: 37404657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of tooth brushing on gloss retention and surface roughness of five bulk-fill resin composites.
    O'Neill C; Kreplak L; Rueggeberg FA; Labrie D; Shimokawa CAK; Price RB
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jan; 30(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 29205770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of nanoscale inorganic content over optical and surface properties of model composites.
    Salgado VE; Cavalcante LM; Silikas N; Schneider LF
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41 Suppl 5():e45-53. PubMed ID: 23748102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface properties of universal and flowable nanohybrid composites after simulated tooth brushing.
    Jin J; Takahashi R; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Am J Dent; 2014 Jun; 27(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 25208363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface properties and color stability of incrementally-filled and bulk-fill composites after in vitro toothbrushing.
    Lai G; Zhao L; Wang J; Kunzelmann KH
    Am J Dent; 2017 Oct; 30(5):262-266. PubMed ID: 29178729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro evaluation of wear and surface roughness of particulate filler composite resin after tooth brushing.
    Al Khuraif AA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 25220522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Color stability, gloss, and surface roughness of indirect composite resins.
    Jain V; Platt JA; Moore K; Spohr AM; Borges GA
    J Oral Sci; 2013 Mar; 55(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 23485595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the roughness and mass loss of the flowable composites after simulated toothbrushing abrasion.
    Garcia FC; Wang L; D'Alpino PH; Souza JB; Araújo PA; Mondelli RF
    Braz Oral Res; 2004; 18(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 15311320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of different surface pre-treatment methods on the microleakage of two different self-adhesive composites in Class V cavities.
    Celik EU; Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25793951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel.
    Poitevin A; De Munck J; Van Ende A; Suyama Y; Mine A; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2013 Feb; 29(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 23107191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of two restorative composites.
    Teixeira EC; Thompson JL; Piascik JR; Thompson JY
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(3):172-80; discussion 181-2. PubMed ID: 15996389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface roughness and gloss of current CAD/CAM resin composites before and after toothbrush abrasion.
    Koizumi H; Saiki O; Nogawa H; Hiraba H; Okazaki T; Matsumura H
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(6):881-7. PubMed ID: 26632238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of toothbrush hardness on in vitro wear and roughness of composite resins.
    Kyoizumi H; Yamada J; Suzuki T; Kanehira M; Finger WJ; Sasaki K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1137-44. PubMed ID: 24858764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of different light-curing units in surface roughness and gloss of resin composites for bleached teeth after challenges.
    Carvalho Andrade K; Pavesi Pini NI; Dias Moda M; de Souza E Silva Ramos F; Dos Santos PH; Fraga Briso AL; Cestari Fagundes T
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Feb; 102():103458. PubMed ID: 31605928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal evaluation of simulated toothbrushing on the roughness and optical stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanofilled resin-based composites.
    da Silva EM; Dória J; da Silva Jde J; Santos GV; Guimarães JG; Poskus LT
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):1081-90. PubMed ID: 23994711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.