283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26581554)
1. Automated Perimetry and Visual Dysfunction in Blast-Related Traumatic Brain Injury.
Lemke S; Cockerham GC; Glynn-Milley C; Lin R; Cockerham KP
Ophthalmology; 2016 Feb; 123(2):415-424. PubMed ID: 26581554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual quality of life in veterans with blast-induced traumatic brain injury.
Lemke S; Cockerham GC; Glynn-Milley C; Cockerham KP
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1602-9. PubMed ID: 24136237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effect of Testing Reliability on Visual Field Sensitivity in Normal Eyes: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study.
Tan NYQ; Tham YC; Koh V; Nguyen DQ; Cheung CY; Aung T; Wong TY; Cheng CY
Ophthalmology; 2018 Jan; 125(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28863943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospectively assessed clinical outcomes in concussive blast vs nonblast traumatic brain injury among evacuated US military personnel.
Mac Donald CL; Johnson AM; Wierzechowski L; Kassner E; Stewart T; Nelson EC; Werner NJ; Zonies D; Oh J; Fang R; Brody DL
JAMA Neurol; 2014 Aug; 71(8):994-1002. PubMed ID: 24934200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ability of healthy volunteers to simulate a neurologic field defect on automated perimetry.
Ghate D; Bodnarchuk B; Sanders S; Deokule S; Kedar S
Ophthalmology; 2014 Mar; 121(3):759-62. PubMed ID: 24314835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
Bayer AU; Erb C
Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of Mozart's music on the performance of glaucoma patients on automated perimetry.
Shue B; Chatterjee A; Fudemberg S; Katz LJ; Moster MR; Navarro MJ; Pro M; Schmidt C; Spaeth GL; Stirbu O; Yalcin A; Myers JS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7347-9. PubMed ID: 21828156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual impairment and dysfunction in combat-injured servicemembers with traumatic brain injury.
Brahm KD; Wilgenburg HM; Kirby J; Ingalla S; Chang CY; Goodrich GL
Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 86(7):817-25. PubMed ID: 19521270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Closed-globe injuries of the ocular surface associated with combat blast exposure.
Cockerham GC; Lemke S; Rice TA; Wang G; Glynn-Milley C; Zumhagen L; Cockerham KP
Ophthalmology; 2014 Nov; 121(11):2165-72. PubMed ID: 25124272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.
Newkirk MR; Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of learning effect on reliability parameters and global indices of standard automated perimetry in cases of primary open angle glaucoma.
Tiwari US; Aishwarya A; Bhale A
Rom J Ophthalmol; 2018; 62(4):277-281. PubMed ID: 30891523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual field indices and patterns of visual field deficits in mesopic and dark-adapted two-colour fundus-controlled perimetry in macular diseases.
Pfau M; Lindner M; Steinberg JS; Thiele S; Brinkmann CK; Fleckenstein M; Holz FG; Schmitz-Valckenberg S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 102(8):1054-1059. PubMed ID: 29146759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of an effective visual field testing strategy for a normal pediatric population.
Akar Y; Yilmaz A; Yucel I
Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 18617757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors.
Singh MD; Jain K
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 65(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 29133651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Threshold Automated Perimetry of the Full Visual Field in Patients With Glaucoma With Mild Visual Loss.
Wall M; Lee EJ; Wanzek RJ; Zamba KD; Turpin A; Chong LX; Marin-Franch I
J Glaucoma; 2019 Nov; 28(11):997-1005. PubMed ID: 31567907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm for central visual field defects unrelated to nerve fiber layer.
Hirasawa K; Shoji N
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):845-54. PubMed ID: 26279004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
