200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26582041)
1. 'They hear "Africa" and they think that there can't be any good services'--perceived context in cross-national learning: a qualitative study of the barriers to Reverse Innovation.
Harris M; Weisberger E; Silver D; Macinko J
Global Health; 2015 Nov; 11():45. PubMed ID: 26582041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. That's not how the learning works - the paradox of Reverse Innovation: a qualitative study.
Harris M; Weisberger E; Silver D; Dadwal V; Macinko J
Global Health; 2016 Jul; 12(1):36. PubMed ID: 27381466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring the bias against low-income country research: an Implicit Association Test.
Harris M; Macinko J; Jimenez G; Mullachery P
Global Health; 2017 Nov; 13(1):80. PubMed ID: 29110668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do International Health Partnerships contribute to reverse innovation? a mixed methods study of THET-supported partnerships in the UK.
Kulasabanathan K; Issa H; Bhatti Y; Prime M; Del Castillo J; Darzi A; Harris M
Global Health; 2017 Apr; 13(1):25. PubMed ID: 28420405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Criteria to assess potential reverse innovations: opportunities for shared learning between high- and low-income countries.
Bhattacharyya O; Wu D; Mossman K; Hayden L; Gill P; Cheng YL; Daar A; Soman D; Synowiec C; Taylor A; Wong J; von Zedtwitz M; Zlotkin S; Mitchell W; McGahan A
Global Health; 2017 Jan; 13(1):4. PubMed ID: 28122623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal and Regulatory Barriers to Reverse Innovation.
Rowthorn V; Plum AJ; Zervos J
Ann Glob Health; 2016; 82(6):991-1000. PubMed ID: 28314501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Making sense of evidence in management decisions: the role of research-based knowledge on innovation adoption and implementation in healthcare. study protocol.
Kyratsis Y; Ahmad R; Holmes A
Implement Sci; 2012 Mar; 7():22. PubMed ID: 22436094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Universities as catalysts of social innovation in health systems in low-and middle-income countries: a multi-country case study.
van Niekerk L; Mathanga DP; Juban N; Castro-Arroyave DM; Balabanova D
Infect Dis Poverty; 2020 Jul; 9(1):90. PubMed ID: 32650822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bridging the health inequality gap: an examination of South Africa's social innovation in health landscape.
de Villiers K
Infect Dis Poverty; 2021 Mar; 10(1):19. PubMed ID: 33648585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Creating a climate that catalyses healthcare innovation in the United Kingdom - learning lessons from international innovators.
Cresswell K; Cunningham-Burley S; Sheikh A
J Innov Health Inform; 2017 Jan; 23(4):882. PubMed ID: 28346133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Process antecedents of challenging, under-cover and readily-adopted innovations.
Adams R; Tranfield D; Denyer D
J Health Organ Manag; 2013; 27(1):42-63. PubMed ID: 23734476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A model for scale up of family health innovations in low-income and middle-income settings: a mixed methods study.
Bradley EH; Curry LA; Taylor LA; Pallas SW; Talbert-Slagle K; Yuan C; Fox A; Minhas D; Ciccone DK; Berg D; Pérez-Escamilla R
BMJ Open; 2012; 2(4):. PubMed ID: 22923624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning from developing countries in strengthening health systems: an evaluation of personal and professional impact among global health volunteers at Addis Ababa University's Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (Ethiopia).
Busse H; Aboneh EA; Tefera G
Global Health; 2014 Sep; 10():64. PubMed ID: 25190076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accelerating Innovation in Health Care: Insights From a Qualitative Inquiry Into United Kingdom and United States Innovation Centers.
Cresswell K; Williams R; Carlile N; Sheikh A
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Sep; 22(9):e19644. PubMed ID: 32975524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When the user is not the chooser: learning from stakeholder involvement in technology adoption decisions in infection control.
Ahmad R; Kyratsis Y; Holmes A
J Hosp Infect; 2012 Jul; 81(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 22633278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beliefs and expectations of rural hospital practitioners towards a developing trauma system: A qualitative case study.
Adams RDF; Cole E; Brundage SI; Morrison Z; Jansen JO
Injury; 2018 Jun; 49(6):1070-1078. PubMed ID: 29602489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence use in decision-making on introducing innovations: a systematic scoping review with stakeholder feedback.
Turner S; D'Lima D; Hudson E; Morris S; Sheringham J; Swart N; Fulop NJ
Implement Sci; 2017 Dec; 12(1):145. PubMed ID: 29202772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
