These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26582319)
1. Measuring the Sensitivity and Construct Validity of 6 Utility Instruments in 7 Disease Areas. Richardson J; Iezzi A; Khan MA; Chen G; Maxwell A Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):147-59. PubMed ID: 26582319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing and explaining differences in the magnitude, content, and sensitivity of utilities predicted by the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB, and AQoL-8D multiattribute utility instruments. Richardson J; Khan MA; Iezzi A; Maxwell A Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):276-91. PubMed ID: 25159172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Bariatric Surgery. Campbell JA; Palmer AJ; Venn A; Sharman M; Otahal P; Neil A Patient; 2016 Aug; 9(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 26841910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. Kennedy-Martin M; Slaap B; Herdman M; van Reenen M; Kennedy-Martin T; Greiner W; Busschbach J; Boye KS Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 21(8):1245-1257. PubMed ID: 32514643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diabetes and quality of life: Comparing results from utility instruments and Diabetes-39. Chen G; Iezzi A; McKie J; Khan MA; Richardson J Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2015 Aug; 109(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 26013567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing outcomes for cost-utility analysis in depression: comparison of five multi-attribute utility instruments with two depression-specific outcome measures. Mihalopoulos C; Chen G; Iezzi A; Khan MA; Richardson J Br J Psychiatry; 2014 Nov; 205(5):390-7. PubMed ID: 25257063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can multi-attribute utility instruments adequately account for subjective well-being? Richardson J; Chen G; Khan MA; Iezzi A Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 25623064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D multi-attribute utility instrument. Richardson J; Iezzi A; Khan MA; Maxwell A Patient; 2014; 7(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 24271592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing Outcomes for Cost-Utility Analysis in Children and Adolescents With Mental Health Problems: Are Multiattribute Utility Instruments Fit for Purpose? Mihalopoulos C; Chen G; Scott JG; Bucholc J; Allen C; Coghill D; Jenkins P; Norman R; Ratcliffe J; Richardson J; Stathis S; Viney R Value Health; 2023 May; 26(5):733-741. PubMed ID: 36535579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Health state utility instruments compared: inquiring into nonlinearity across EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI-3 and 15D. Gamst-Klaussen T; Chen G; Lamu AN; Olsen JA Qual Life Res; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1667-78. PubMed ID: 26687615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Hawthorne G; Richardson J; Day NA Ann Med; 2001 Jul; 33(5):358-70. PubMed ID: 11491195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the disutility of relapse in relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis using the EQ-5D-5L, AQoL-8D, EQ-5D-5L-psychosocial, and SF-6D: implications for health economic evaluation models. Ahmad H; Campbell JA; van der Mei I; Taylor BV; Xia Q; Zhao T; Palmer AJ Qual Life Res; 2023 Dec; 32(12):3373-3387. PubMed ID: 37522942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Marra CA; Woolcott JC; Kopec JA; Shojania K; Offer R; Brazier JE; Esdaile JM; Anis AH Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(7):1571-82. PubMed ID: 15652688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deriving health utilities from the MacNew Heart Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire. Chen G; McKie J; Khan MA; Richardson JR Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2015 Oct; 14(5):405-15. PubMed ID: 24829296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the preference-based EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Yang F; Lau T; Lee E; Vathsala A; Chia KS; Luo N Eur J Health Econ; 2015 Dec; 16(9):1019-26. PubMed ID: 25519850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of depression on health-related quality of life and wellbeing: identifying important dimensions and assessing their inclusion in multi-attribute utility instruments. Engel L; Chen G; Richardson J; Mihalopoulos C Qual Life Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2873-2884. PubMed ID: 30006664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of preference-based health-related quality of life questionnaires in spinal cord injury research. Whitehurst DG; Noonan VK; Dvorak MF; Bryan S Spinal Cord; 2012 Sep; 50(9):646-54. PubMed ID: 22641255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deriving population norms for the AQoL-6D and AQoL-8D multi-attribute utility instruments from web-based data. Maxwell A; Özmen M; Iezzi A; Richardson J Qual Life Res; 2016 Dec; 25(12):3209-3219. PubMed ID: 27344318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]