176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26582382)
1. [Inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: Study for prevention of wound complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile cancer by epidermal vacuum therapy (PräVAC, EUDAMED: CIV-12-07-008204; DRKS-ID: DRKS00005257)].
Maurer T; Seitz AK; Schneider S; Protzel C; Retz M; Rexer H;
Urologe A; 2015 Dec; 54(12):1799-801. PubMed ID: 26582382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Inguinal lymph node dissection: epidermal vacuum therapy for prevention of wound complications.
Tauber R; Schmid S; Horn T; Thalgott M; Heck M; Haller B; Kübler H; Autenrieth M; Retz M; Gschwend JE; Maurer T
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 23107617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Final results of the PräVAC trial: prevention of wound complications following inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer using epidermal vacuum-assisted wound closure.
Schmid SC; Seitz AK; Haller B; Fritsche HM; Huber T; Burger M; Gschwend JE; Maurer T
World J Urol; 2021 Feb; 39(2):613-620. PubMed ID: 32372159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional wound care in the treatment of wound failures following inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: a retrospective study.
Denzinger S; Lübke L; Roessler W; Wieland WF; Kessler S; Burger M
Eur Urol; 2007 May; 51(5):1320-5. PubMed ID: 17207916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: study on the prevention of wound healing complications].
Maurer T; Protzel C; Gschwend JE; Rexer H;
Urologe A; 2014 Apr; 53(4):561-2. PubMed ID: 24700190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Contemporary inguinal lymph node dissection: minimizing complications.
Spiess PE; Hernandez MS; Pettaway CA
World J Urol; 2009 Apr; 27(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 18762945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early wound complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: a historical cohort study and risk-factor analysis.
Stuiver MM; Djajadiningrat RS; Graafland NM; Vincent AD; Lucas C; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2013 Sep; 64(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 23490726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radical open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: surgical technique, early complications and late outcomes.
Koifman L; Hampl D; Koifman N; Vides AJ; Ornellas AA
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2086-92. PubMed ID: 23770135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma.
Ravi R
Br J Urol; 1993 Dec; 72(6):941-5. PubMed ID: 8306161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Not Available].
Maurer T; Protzel C; Gschwend JE; Rexer H
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Mar; 46(2):103. PubMed ID: 25897531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fascia lata preservation during inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: rationale and outcome.
Yao K; Zou ZJ; Li ZS; Zhou FJ; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Li YH; Han H
Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):642-7. PubMed ID: 23876593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified technique of radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: morbidity and outcome.
Yao K; Tu H; Li YH; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Zhou FJ; Han H
J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):546-52. PubMed ID: 20620415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inguinal lymphadenectomy for stage III melanoma: a comparative study of two surgical approaches at the onset of lymphoedema.
Bertheuil N; Sulpice L; Levi Sandri GB; Lavoué V; Watier E; Meunier B
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 25524886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients?
Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Silva MN; Molina WR; Forseto PH; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER
J Endourol; 2008 Aug; 22(8):1687-91. PubMed ID: 18657031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Surgical technique and postoperative morbidity following radical inguinal/iliacal lymph node dissection--a prospective study in 67 patients with malignant melanoma metastatic to the groin].
Mall JW; Reetz C; Koplin G; Schäfer-Hesterberg G; Voit C; Neuss H
Zentralbl Chir; 2009 Sep; 134(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 19757344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility, complications and oncologic results of a limited inguinal lymph node dissection in the management of penile cancer.
Tsaur I; Biegel C; Gust K; Huesch T; Borgmann H; Brandt MP; Kurosch M; Reiter M; Bartsch G; Schilling D; Haferkamp A
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):486-95. PubMed ID: 26200541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selective lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.
Bucher S; Guerra M; Ribuffo D
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Aug; 15(8):967-70. PubMed ID: 21845808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Marconnet L; Rigaud J; Bouchot O
J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2227-32. PubMed ID: 20399455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospectively packaged ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the disseminative pattern of lymph node metastasis.
Zhu Y; Zhang SL; Ye DW; Yao XD; Dai B; Zhang HL; Shen YJ; Zhu YP; Shi GH; Ma CG
J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2103-8. PubMed ID: 19286211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer.
Protzel C; Alcaraz A; Horenblas S; Pizzocaro G; Zlotta A; Hakenberg OW
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1075-88. PubMed ID: 19264390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
