146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26582489)
1. An initial biomechanical investigation of fusionless anterior tether constructs for controlled scoliosis correction.
Lavelle WF; Moldavsky M; Cai Y; Ordway NR; Bucklen BS
Spine J; 2016 Mar; 16(3):408-13. PubMed ID: 26582489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of Implant Loosening After Cyclic Loading of Fusionless Growth Modulation Techniques: Nitinol Staples Versus Flexible Tether.
Yaszay B; Doan JD; Parvaresh KC; Farnsworth CL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Apr; 42(7):443-449. PubMed ID: 27454539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical effect of 4-rod technique on lumbosacral fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation.
Wang T; Liu H; Zheng Z; Li Z; Wang J; Shrivastava SS; Yang H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E925-9. PubMed ID: 23609200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical assessment of thoracic spine stapling.
Puttlitz CM; Masaru F; Barkley A; Diab M; Acaroglu E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):766-71. PubMed ID: 17414910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An investigation of range of motion preservation in fusionless anterior double screw and cord constructs for scoliosis correction.
Trobisch P; Mahoney JM; Eichenlaub EK; Antonacci CL; Cuddihy L; Amin DB; Razo-Castaneda D; Orbach MR; McGuckin JP; Bucklen BS; Antonacci MD; Betz RR
Eur Spine J; 2023 Apr; 32(4):1173-1186. PubMed ID: 36871254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of a simulated T-9 burst fracture of the thoracic spine with an intact rib cage.
Perry TG; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; Francis T; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 24949903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical simulations of costo-vertebral and anterior vertebral body tethers for the fusionless treatment of pediatric scoliosis.
Aubin CÉ; Clin J; Rawlinson J
J Orthop Res; 2018 Jan; 36(1):254-264. PubMed ID: 28685857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spinal growth modulation with posterior unilateral elastic tether in immature swine model.
Liu J; Li Z; Shen J; Xue X
Spine J; 2015 Jan; 15(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 25066626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective comparison of gait and trunk range of motion in adolescents with idiopathic thoracic scoliosis undergoing anterior or posterior spinal fusion.
Engsberg JR; Lenke LG; Uhrich ML; Ross SA; Bridwell KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(17):1993-2000. PubMed ID: 12973147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motion preservation surgery for scoliosis with a vertebral body tethering system: a biomechanical study.
Nicolini LF; Kobbe P; Seggewiß J; Greven J; Ribeiro M; Beckmann A; Da Paz S; Eschweiler J; Prescher A; Markert B; Stoffel M; Hildebrand F; Trobisch PD
Eur Spine J; 2022 Apr; 31(4):1013-1021. PubMed ID: 34716821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of scoliosis correction with thoracic segmental pedicle screw constructs using fulcrum bending radiographs.
Cheung WY; Lenke LG; Luk KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(5):557-61. PubMed ID: 20118839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Porcine spine finite element model: a complementary tool to experimental scoliosis fusionless instrumentation.
Hachem B; Aubin CE; Parent S
Eur Spine J; 2017 Jun; 26(6):1610-1617. PubMed ID: 28070685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter.
Scheer JK; Tang JA; Deviren V; Acosta F; Buckley JM; Pekmezci M; McClellan RT; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 21235305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short Segment Spinal Instrumentation With Index Vertebra Pedicle Screw Placement for Pathologies Involving the Anterior and Middle Vertebral Column Is as Effective as Long Segment Stabilization With Cage Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study.
Bartanusz V; Harris J; Moldavsky M; Cai Y; Bucklen B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Nov; 40(22):1729-36. PubMed ID: 26536447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contribution of Lateral Decubitus Positioning and Cable Tensioning on Immediate Correction in Anterior Vertebral Body Growth Modulation.
Cobetto N; Aubin CE; Parent S
Spine Deform; 2018; 6(5):507-513. PubMed ID: 30122385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
