267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26583233)
1. AMBER-DYES: Characterization of Charge Fluctuations and Force Field Parameterization of Fluorescent Dyes for Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Graen T; Hoefling M; Grubmüller H
J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Dec; 10(12):5505-12. PubMed ID: 26583233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomembrane simulations of 12 lipid types using the general amber force field in a tensionless ensemble.
Coimbra JT; Sousa SF; Fernandes PA; Rangel M; Ramos MJ
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2014; 32(1):88-103. PubMed ID: 23730894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New-generation amber united-atom force field.
Yang L; Tan CH; Hsieh MJ; Wang J; Duan Y; Cieplak P; Caldwell J; Kollman PA; Luo R
J Phys Chem B; 2006 Jul; 110(26):13166-76. PubMed ID: 16805629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CHARMM-DYES: Parameterization of Fluorescent Dyes for Use with the CHARMM Force Field.
Shaw RA; Johnston-Wood T; Ambrose B; Craggs TD; Hill JG
J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Dec; 16(12):7817-7824. PubMed ID: 33226216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomolecular force fields: where have we been, where are we now, where do we need to go and how do we get there?
Dauber-Osguthorpe P; Hagler AT
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Feb; 33(2):133-203. PubMed ID: 30506158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Communication: Quantum polarized fluctuating charge model: a practical method to include ligand polarizability in biomolecular simulations.
Kimura SR; Rajamani R; Langley DR
J Chem Phys; 2011 Dec; 135(23):231101. PubMed ID: 22191857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a QM/MM force field and molecular mechanics force fields in simulations of alanine and glycine "dipeptides" (Ace-Ala-Nme and Ace-Gly-Nme) in water in relation to the problem of modeling the unfolded peptide backbone in solution.
Hu H; Elstner M; Hermans J
Proteins; 2003 Feb; 50(3):451-63. PubMed ID: 12557187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AMBER-DYES in AMBER: Implementation of fluorophore and linker parameters into AmberTools.
Schepers B; Gohlke H
J Chem Phys; 2020 Jun; 152(22):221103. PubMed ID: 32534525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Secondary Structure Formation Using 10 Different Force Fields in Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Cino EA; Choy WY; Karttunen M
J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Aug; 8(8):2725-2740. PubMed ID: 22904695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA.
Galindo-Murillo R; Robertson JC; Zgarbová M; Šponer J; Otyepka M; Jurečka P; Cheatham TE
J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Aug; 12(8):4114-27. PubMed ID: 27300587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some practical approaches to treating electrostatic polarization of proteins.
Ji C; Mei Y
Acc Chem Res; 2014 Sep; 47(9):2795-803. PubMed ID: 24883956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixed-Charge Atomistic Force Fields for Molecular Dynamics Simulations in the Condensed Phase: An Overview.
Riniker S
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Mar; 58(3):565-578. PubMed ID: 29510041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. QuanPol: a full spectrum and seamless QM/MM program.
Thellamurege NM; Si D; Cui F; Zhu H; Lai R; Li H
J Comput Chem; 2013 Dec; 34(32):2816-33. PubMed ID: 24122765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model.
Patel S; Mackerell AD; Brooks CL
J Comput Chem; 2004 Sep; 25(12):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15224394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of charge models for fixed-charge force fields: small-molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent.
Mobley DL; Dumont E; Chodera JD; Dill KA
J Phys Chem B; 2007 Mar; 111(9):2242-54. PubMed ID: 17291029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conformational simulations of aqueous solvated alpha-conotoxin GI and its single disulfide analogues using a polarizable force field model.
Jiang N; Ma J
J Phys Chem A; 2008 Oct; 112(40):9854-67. PubMed ID: 18788721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrepancies between conformational distributions of a polyalanine peptide in solution obtained from molecular dynamics force fields and amide I' band profiles.
Verbaro D; Ghosh I; Nau WM; Schweitzer-Stenner R
J Phys Chem B; 2010 Dec; 114(51):17201-8. PubMed ID: 21138254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Force field development phase II: Relaxation of physics-based criteria… or inclusion of more rigorous physics into the representation of molecular energetics.
Hagler AT
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Feb; 33(2):205-264. PubMed ID: 30506159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations.
Guvench O; MacKerell AD
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 443():63-88. PubMed ID: 18446282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Polarizable Mean-Field Model of Water for Biological Simulations with Amber and Charmm force fields.
Leontyev IV; Stuchebrukhov AA
J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Sep; 8(9):3207-3216. PubMed ID: 25580096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
