These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26583468)
1. The Study of Cobb Angular Velocity in Cervical Spine during Dynamic Extension-Flexion. Ren D; Hu Z; Yuan W Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41(7):E410-5. PubMed ID: 26583468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation. Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical motion segment percent contributions to flexion-extension during continuous functional movement in control subjects and arthrodesis patients. Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(9):E533-9. PubMed ID: 23370681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading. Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Six-degrees-of-freedom cervical spine range of motion during dynamic flexion-extension after single-level anterior arthrodesis: comparison with asymptomatic control subjects. Anderst WJ; Lee JY; Donaldson WF; Kang JD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 23515984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical significance of cervical vertebral flexion and extension spatial alignment changes. Xu-hui Z; Jia-hu F; Lian-shun J; Zhi-yong C; Yong Z; Xiong-sheng C; Wei-ping W Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E21-6. PubMed ID: 19127144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement. Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensional changes of the neuroforamina in subaxial cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension. Mao H; Driscoll SJ; Li JS; Li G; Wood KB; Cha TD Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 26681352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantifying the effects of age, gender, degeneration, and adjacent level degeneration on cervical spine range of motion using multivariate analyses. Simpson AK; Biswas D; Emerson JW; Lawrence BD; Grauer JN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 18197104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study. Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake K; Lucke M; Schröder R; Mittlmeier T Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(9):1028-37. PubMed ID: 11337621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extension. Wu SK; Kuo LC; Lan HC; Tsai SW; Chen CL; Su FC Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1435-44. PubMed ID: 17464516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis. Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motion path of the instant center of rotation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension: implications for artificial disc design and evaluation of motion quality after arthrodesis. Anderst W; Baillargeon E; Donaldson W; Lee J; Kang J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(10):E594-601. PubMed ID: 23429677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic Cervical Radiographs in Patients with Hirayama Disease: An Unneglectable Factor on the Choice of Surgery Options. Wang H; Sun C; Yang S; Jiang J; Lu F; Ma X; Xia X World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e433-e440. PubMed ID: 29530702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical spine segmental vertebral motion in healthy volunteers feigning restriction of neck flexion and extension. Puglisi F; Strimpakos N; Papathanasiou M; Kapreli E; Bonelli A; Sgambetterra S; Ferrari R Int J Legal Med; 2007 Sep; 121(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 16847699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Motion changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study. Hussain M; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):939-47. PubMed ID: 20375779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The range and nature of flexion-extension motion in the cervical spine. Holmes A; Wang C; Han ZH; Dang GT Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Nov; 19(22):2505-10. PubMed ID: 7855673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics. Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go? Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]