These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2658359)

  • 21. The Canadian National Breast Screening Studies are compromised and their results are unreliable. They should not factor into decisions about breast cancer screening.
    Kopans DB
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 165(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 28528449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish Two-County Trial.
    Tabar L; Fagerberg G; Chen HH; Duffy SW; Smart CR; Gad A; Smith RA
    Cancer; 1995 May; 75(10):2507-17. PubMed ID: 7736395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials.
    Nyström L; Andersson I; Bjurstam N; Frisell J; Nordenskjöld B; Rutqvist LE
    Lancet; 2002 Mar; 359(9310):909-19. PubMed ID: 11918907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammography screening controversies.
    Miller AB
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 7982240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.
    Fletcher SW; Black W; Harris R; Rimer BK; Shapiro S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Oct; 85(20):1644-56. PubMed ID: 8105098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial.
    Bjurstam N; Björneld L; Warwick J; Sala E; Duffy SW; Nyström L; Walker N; Cahlin E; Eriksson O; Hafström LO; Lingaas H; Mattsson J; Persson S; Rudenstam CM; Salander H; Säve-Söderbergh J; Wahlin T
    Cancer; 2003 May; 97(10):2387-96. PubMed ID: 12733136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 16-year mortality from breast cancer in the UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9168):1909-14. PubMed ID: 10371568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials.
    Shen Y; Yang Y; Inoue LY; Munsell MF; Miller AB; Berry DA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Aug; 97(16):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16106024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.
    Jonsson H; Bordás P; Wallin H; Nyström L; Lenner P
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17626708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Humphrey LL; Helfand M; Chan BK; Woolf SH
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):347-60. PubMed ID: 12204020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammographic screening of women aged 40 to 49 years. Is it justified?
    Feig SA
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1994 Dec; 21(4):587-606. PubMed ID: 7731636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficacy of mammographic screening of the elderly: a case-referent study in the Nijmegen program in The Netherlands.
    van Dijck JA; Holland R; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Mravunac M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Jun; 86(12):934-8. PubMed ID: 8196083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality assurance in follow-up and initial treatment for screening mammography programs in 22 countries.
    Klabunde CN; Sancho-Garnier H; Taplin S; Thoresen S; Ohuchi N; Ballard-Barbash R;
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Dec; 14(6):449-61. PubMed ID: 12515331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Screening mammography: a successful public health initiative.
    Feig SA
    Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2006; 20(2-3):125-33. PubMed ID: 17199907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
    Myers ER; Moorman P; Gierisch JM; Havrilesky LJ; Grimm LJ; Ghate S; Davidson B; Mongtomery RC; Crowley MJ; McCrory DC; Kendrick A; Sanders GD
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(15):1615-34. PubMed ID: 26501537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years: evaluation of the Swedish Mammography Screening in Young Women (SCRY) cohort.
    Hellquist BN; Duffy SW; Abdsaleh S; Björneld L; Bordás P; Tabár L; Viták B; Zackrisson S; Nyström L; Jonsson H
    Cancer; 2011 Feb; 117(4):714-22. PubMed ID: 20882563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States.
    Katz SJ; Hofer TP
    JAMA; 1994 Aug; 272(7):530-4. PubMed ID: 8046807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence.
    Schopper D; de Wolf C
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jul; 45(11):1916-23. PubMed ID: 19398327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.