These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26583983)

  • 1. A Caveat on SCC-DFTB and Noncovalent Interactions Involving Sulfur Atoms.
    Petraglia R; Corminboeuf C
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Jul; 9(7):3020-5. PubMed ID: 26583983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SCC-DFTB parameters for simulating hybrid gold-thiolates compounds.
    Fihey A; Hettich C; Touzeau J; Maurel F; Perrier A; Köhler C; Aradi B; Frauenheim T
    J Comput Chem; 2015 Oct; 36(27):2075-87. PubMed ID: 26280464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accurate Modeling of Organic Molecular Crystals by Dispersion-Corrected Density Functional Tight Binding (DFTB).
    Brandenburg JG; Grimme S
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2014 Jun; 5(11):1785-9. PubMed ID: 26273854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hybrid Density Functional Tight Binding (DFTB)─Molecular Mechanics Approach for a Low-Cost Expansion of DFTB Applicability.
    Budiutama G; Li R; Manzhos S; Ihara M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Aug; 19(15):5189-5198. PubMed ID: 37450317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The treatment of solvation by a generalized Born model and a self-consistent charge-density functional theory-based tight-binding method.
    Xie L; Liu H
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Nov; 23(15):1404-15. PubMed ID: 12370943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bulk and Surface Properties of Rutile TiO2 from Self-Consistent-Charge Density Functional Tight Binding.
    Fox H; Newman KE; Schneider WF; Corcelli SA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2010 Feb; 6(2):499-507. PubMed ID: 26617305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-Consistent Charge Density-Functional Tight-Binding Parametrization for Pt-Ru Alloys.
    Shi H; Koskinen P; Ramasubramaniam A
    J Phys Chem A; 2017 Mar; 121(12):2497-2502. PubMed ID: 28267337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding intermolecular interactions of large systems in ground state and excited state by using density functional based tight binding methods.
    Xu Y; Friedman R; Wu W; Su P
    J Chem Phys; 2021 May; 154(19):194106. PubMed ID: 34240911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Density-Functional Tight-Binding Combined with the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method.
    Nishimoto Y; Fedorov DG; Irle S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Nov; 10(11):4801-12. PubMed ID: 26584367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SCC-DFTB Parametrization for Boron and Boranes.
    Grundkötter-Stock B; Bezugly V; Kunstmann J; Cuniberti G; Frauenheim T; Niehaus TA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Mar; 8(3):1153-63. PubMed ID: 26593373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling vibrational spectra using the self-consistent charge density-functional tight-binding method. I. Raman spectra.
    Witek HA; Morokuma K; Stradomska A
    J Chem Phys; 2004 Sep; 121(11):5171-8. PubMed ID: 15352809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correction for dispersion and Coulombic interactions in molecular clusters with density functional derived methods: application to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon clusters.
    Rapacioli M; Spiegelman F; Talbi D; Mineva T; Goursot A; Heine T; Seifert G
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Jun; 130(24):244304. PubMed ID: 19566150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The self-consistent charge density functional tight binding method applied to liquid water and the hydrated excess proton: benchmark simulations.
    Maupin CM; Aradi B; Voth GA
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 May; 114(20):6922-31. PubMed ID: 20426461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structural Characterization of Sulfur-Containing Water Clusters Using a Density-Functional Based Tight-Binding Approach.
    Korchagina KA; Simon A; Rapacioli M; Spiegelman F; Cuny J
    J Phys Chem A; 2016 Nov; 120(45):9089-9100. PubMed ID: 27809528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-interaction and strong correlation in DFTB.
    Hourahine B; Sanna S; Aradi B; Köhler C; Niehaus T; Frauenheim T
    J Phys Chem A; 2007 Jul; 111(26):5671-7. PubMed ID: 17552499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling realistic TiO
    Selli D; Fazio G; Di Valentin C
    J Chem Phys; 2017 Oct; 147(16):164701. PubMed ID: 29096504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An efficient way to model complex magnetite: Assessment of SCC-DFTB against DFT.
    Liu H; Seifert G; Di Valentin C
    J Chem Phys; 2019 Mar; 150(9):094703. PubMed ID: 30849917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Density Functional and Semiempirical Molecular Orbital Methods Including Dispersion Corrections for the Accurate Description of Noncovalent Interactions Involving Sulfur-Containing Molecules.
    Morgado CA; McNamara JP; Hillier IH; Burton NA; Vincent MA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2007 Sep; 3(5):1656-64. PubMed ID: 26627611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parametrization and Benchmark of DFTB3 for Organic Molecules.
    Gaus M; Goez A; Elstner M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Jan; 9(1):338-54. PubMed ID: 26589037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies.
    Hobza P
    Acc Chem Res; 2012 Apr; 45(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 22225511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.