These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26584502)
21. Virtual occlusion in planning orthognathic surgical procedures. Nadjmi N; Mollemans W; Daelemans A; Van Hemelen G; Schutyser F; Bergé S Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 39(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 20226628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Re: How accurate is model planning for orthognathic surgery? Sharifi A, Jones R, Ayoub A, Moos K, Walker F, Khambay B, McHugh S. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:1089-1093. Olszewski R Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):1009-10; author reply 1010. PubMed ID: 19473817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Anterior segmental distraction for a Class III maxillary prosthetic defect in a cleft palate patient. Van Sickels JE; Abadi B; Attisha R J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 20662670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A new method to move mandible to intercuspal position in virtual three-dimensional orthognathic surgery by integrating primary occlusion model. Dai J; Wang X; Hu G; Shen SG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):e484-9. PubMed ID: 22907113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Computation of tooth axes of existent and missing teeth from 3D CT images. Wang Y; Wu L; Guo H; Qiu T; Huang Y; Lin B; Wang L Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Dec; 60(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 25941910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Virtual surgical planning for treatment of severe mandibular retrognathia with collapsed occlusion using contemporary surgical and prosthodontic protocols. Dhima M; Salinas TJ; Rieck KL J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1923-32. PubMed ID: 23988145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy evaluation of surgical guides in implant dentistry by non-contact reverse engineering techniques. Giordano M; Ausiello P; Martorelli M Dent Mater; 2012 Sep; 28(9):e178-85. PubMed ID: 22796037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study. Chen X; Yuan J; Wang C; Huang Y; Kang L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical experiences of digital model surgery and the rapid-prototyped wafer for maxillary orthognathic surgery. Kim BC; Lee CE; Park W; Kim MK; Zhengguo P; Yu HS; Yi CK; Lee SH Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Mar; 111(3):278-85.e1. PubMed ID: 20692187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Research progress of digital occlusion setup in orthognathic surgery]. Li L; Niu F Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Feb; 37(2):247-251. PubMed ID: 36796824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reference-based digital concept to restore partially edentulous patients following an immediate loading protocol: a pilot study. Tahmaseb A; De Clerck R; Eckert S; Wismeijer D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):707-17. PubMed ID: 21841978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of prosthodontic planning on lateral occlusion scheme: a comparison between conventional and digital planning. Abduo J; Bennamoun M; Tennant M; McGeachie J J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 26018312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning. Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A radiopaque implant template for partially edentulous patients. Zahran MH; Fenton A J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):390-2. PubMed ID: 20493329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Integration accuracy of digital dental models and 3-dimensional computerized tomography images by sequential point- and surface-based markerless registration. Kim BC; Lee CE; Park W; Kang SH; Zhengguo P; Yi CK; Lee SH Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 20591700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does powdering of the dentition increase the accuracy of fusing 3D stereophotographs and digital dental casts. Rangel FA; Chiu YT; Maal TJ; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 26781687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. New protocol for three-dimensional surgical planning and CAD/CAM splint generation in orthognathic surgery: an in vitro and in vivo study. Hernández-Alfaro F; Guijarro-Martínez R Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 42(12):1547-56. PubMed ID: 23768749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [X-ray cephalometric characteristics of the facial skeleton after partial loss of the teeth complicated by deformity of the dental arches]. Kurochkin IuK Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1984; 63(4):61-4. PubMed ID: 6591542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Mesiodistal dental movement toward remodeled edentulous alveolar ridge: Digital model assessment. Herrera Sanches FS; Santos PBDD; Ferreira MC; Freitas KMS; Henriques JFC; Janson G; Garib D Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jul; 152(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 28651769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]