BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26585011)

  • 1. Harmonic responses and cavitation activity of encapsulated microbubbles coupled with magnetic nanoparticles.
    Gu Y; Chen C; Tu J; Guo X; Wu H; Zhang D
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2016 Mar; 29():309-16. PubMed ID: 26585011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical and dynamic characteristics of encapsulated microbubbles coupled by magnetic nanoparticles as multifunctional imaging and drug delivery agents.
    Guo G; Lu L; Yin L; Tu J; Guo X; Wu J; Xu D; Zhang D
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(22):6729-47. PubMed ID: 25327566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-embedded encapsulated microbubbles as dual contrast agents of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging.
    Yang F; Li Y; Chen Z; Zhang Y; Wu J; Gu N
    Biomaterials; 2009 Aug; 30(23-24):3882-90. PubMed ID: 19395082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The enhanced HIFU-induced thermal effect via magnetic ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Yang D; Ni Z; Yang Y; Xu G; Tu J; Guo X; Huang P; Zhang D
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2018 Dec; 49():111-117. PubMed ID: 30057178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation on the inertial cavitation threshold and shell properties of commercialized ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Guo X; Li Q; Zhang Z; Zhang D; Tu J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1622-31. PubMed ID: 23927202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inertial cavitation threshold of nested microbubbles.
    Wallace N; Dicker S; Lewin P; Wrenn SP
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():67-74. PubMed ID: 25620709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic Characterization and Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Long-Circulating Lipid-Coated Microbubbles.
    Li H; Yang Y; Zhang M; Yin L; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 May; 37(5):1243-1256. PubMed ID: 29127707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Drug-loaded and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle surface-embedded amphiphilic block copolymer micelles for integrated chemotherapeutic drug delivery and MR imaging.
    Hu J; Qian Y; Wang X; Liu T; Liu S
    Langmuir; 2012 Jan; 28(4):2073-82. PubMed ID: 22047551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thresholds for inertial cavitation in albunex suspensions under pulsed ultrasound conditions.
    Chang PP; Chen WS; Mourad PD; Poliachik SL; Crum LA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Jan; 48(1):161-70. PubMed ID: 11367783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of shell composition on the resonance frequency of microbubble contrast agents.
    Dicker S; Mleczko M; Siepmann M; Wallace N; Sunny Y; Bawiec CR; Schmitz G; Lewin P; Wrenn SP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1292-302. PubMed ID: 23683409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrafast 2-dimensional image monitoring and array-based passive cavitation detection for ultrasound contrast agent destruction in a variably sized region.
    Xu S; Hu H; Jiang H; Xu Z; Wan M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1957-70. PubMed ID: 25336483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Superparamagnetic nanoparticle-inclusion microbubbles for ultrasound contrast agents.
    Yang F; Li L; Li Y; Chen Z; Wu J; Gu N
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):6129-41. PubMed ID: 18854605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhanced microbubble contrast agent oscillation following 250 kHz insonation.
    Ilovitsh T; Ilovitsh A; Foiret J; Caskey CF; Kusunose J; Fite BZ; Zhang H; Mahakian LM; Tam S; Butts-Pauly K; Qin S; Ferrara KW
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16347. PubMed ID: 30397280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Iron oxide nanoparticle-containing microbubble composites as contrast agents for MR and ultrasound dual-modality imaging.
    Liu Z; Lammers T; Ehling J; Fokong S; Bornemann J; Kiessling F; Gätjens J
    Biomaterials; 2011 Sep; 32(26):6155-63. PubMed ID: 21632103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cavitation threshold of microbubbles in gel tunnels by focused ultrasound.
    Sassaroli E; Hynynen K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1651-60. PubMed ID: 17590501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of acoustic parameters on the cavitation behavior of SonoVue microbubbles induced by pulsed ultrasound.
    Lin Y; Lin L; Cheng M; Jin L; Du L; Han T; Xu L; Yu ACH; Qin P
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2017 Mar; 35(Pt A):176-184. PubMed ID: 27707644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents.
    Radhakrishnan K; Bader KB; Haworth KJ; Kopechek JA; Raymond JL; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6541-63. PubMed ID: 24002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.
    Ammi AY; Cleveland RO; Mamou J; Wang GI; Bridal SL; O'Brien WD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Jan; 53(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 16471439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Stable" inertial cavitation.
    Church CC; Carstensen EL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Oct; 27(10):1435-7. PubMed ID: 11731057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SPIO labeling of endothelial cells using ultrasound and targeted microbubbles at diagnostic pressures.
    Skachkov I; Luan Y; van Tiel ST; van der Steen AFW; de Jong N; Bernsen MR; Kooiman K
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204354. PubMed ID: 30235336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.