These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2658545)

  • 1. Computer-assisted location of reference points in three dimensions for radiographic cephalometry.
    Brown T; Abbott AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Jun; 95(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 2658545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image corrected cephalometric analysis (ICCA): design and evaluation.
    Spolyar JL; Vasileff W; MacIntosh RB
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 Nov; 30(6):528-39; discussion 539-41. PubMed ID: 8280730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method for correction of radiographic errors in serial three-dimensional cephalometry.
    Rousset MM; Simonek F; Dubus JP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jan; 32(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 12820854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional facial morphometry and conventional cephalometrics: a correlation study.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Puleo A; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 9456609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Landmarking of cephalograms using a microcomputer system.
    Tong W; Nugent ST; Gregson PH; Jensen GM; Fay DF
    Comput Biomed Res; 1990 Aug; 23(4):358-79. PubMed ID: 2394093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis.
    Matteson SR; Bechtold W; Phillips C; Staab EV
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1989 Oct; 47(10):1053-61. PubMed ID: 2795298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric analysis comparing five different methods.
    Oliver RG
    Br J Orthod; 1991 Nov; 18(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 1782186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated 2-D cephalometric analysis on X-ray images by a model-based approach.
    Yue W; Yin D; Li C; Wang G; Xu T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1615-23. PubMed ID: 16916096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing digital and conventional cephalometric radiographs.
    Cohen JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 16102396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning.
    Kusnoto B
    Clin Plast Surg; 2007 Jul; 34(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 17692701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A biplanar cephalometric stereoradiography technique.
    Trocmé MC; Sather AH; An KN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 2378321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reliability of iWitness photogrammetry in maxillofacial application].
    Jiang C; Song Q; He W; Chen S; Hong T
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Jun; 33(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 26281261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of beam collimation in lateral radiographic cephalometry.
    Liu YT; Gravely JF
    Br J Orthod; 1991 May; 18(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 1911689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Knowledge-based cephalometric analysis: a comparison with clinicians using interactive computer methods.
    Davis DN; Forsyth D
    Comput Biomed Res; 1994 Jun; 27(3):210-28. PubMed ID: 8070256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms.
    Macrì V; Wenzel A
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Apr; 15(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 8500539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical validation of the Di3D stereophotogrammetry surface imaging system.
    Winder RJ; Darvann TA; McKnight W; Magee JD; Ramsay-Baggs P
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 17980940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.