These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26585627)

  • 1. Trends in the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    Agarwal S; Sud K; Martin JM; Menon V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1772-4. PubMed ID: 26585627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Cohen DJ; Yeh RW
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007270. PubMed ID: 30608880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.
    Berg DD; Barnett CF; Kenigsberg BB; Papolos A; Alviar CL; Baird-Zars VM; Barsness GW; Bohula EA; Brennan J; Burke JA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Cremer PC; Daniels LB; DeFilippis AP; Gerber DA; Granger CB; Hollenberg S; Horowitz JM; Gladden JD; Katz JN; Keeley EC; Keller N; Kontos MC; Lawler PR; Menon V; Metkus TS; Miller PE; Nativi-Nicolau J; Newby LK; Park JG; Phreaner N; Roswell RO; Schulman SP; Sinha SS; Snell RJ; Solomon MA; Teuteberg JJ; Tymchak W; van Diepen S; Morrow DA
    Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Nov; 12(11):e006635. PubMed ID: 31707801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Yeh RW
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Apr; 13(18):e2152-e2159. PubMed ID: 29400657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support: current concepts and future directions.
    Briceno N; Kapur NK; Perera D
    Heart; 2016 Sep; 102(18):1494-507. PubMed ID: 27503999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
    Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
    Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Bremen STEMI Registry.
    Backhaus T; Fach A; Schmucker J; Fiehn E; Garstka D; Stehmeier J; Hambrecht R; Wienbergen H
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 May; 107(5):371-379. PubMed ID: 29230546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014.
    Vallabhajosyula S; Prasad A; Bell MR; Sandhu GS; Eleid MF; Dunlay SM; Schears GJ; Stulak JM; Singh M; Gersh BJ; Jaffe AS; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Barsness GW
    Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Dec; 12(12):e005929. PubMed ID: 31826642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal trends of survival and utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest secondary to ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation.
    Patel NJ; Atti V; Kumar V; Panakos A; Anantha Narayanan M; Bhardwaj B; Arora S; Deshmukh AJ; Patel N; Basir MB; Cohen MG; Kini AS; Sharma SK; Dangas G; O'Neill WW; Alfonso CE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 94(4):578-587. PubMed ID: 30790415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Rab T; O'Neill W
    Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2019 Oct; 29(7):410-417. PubMed ID: 30573276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States.
    Kolte D; Khera S; Aronow WS; Mujib M; Palaniswamy C; Sule S; Jain D; Gotsis W; Ahmed A; Frishman WH; Fonarow GC
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2014 Jan; 3(1):e000590. PubMed ID: 24419737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Telukuntla KS; Estep JD
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2020; 16(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 32280415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regional Variation in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock in the United States.
    Vallabhajosyula S; Patlolla SH; Dunlay SM; Prasad A; Bell MR; Jaffe AS; Gersh BJ; Rihal CS; Holmes DR; Barsness GW
    Circ Heart Fail; 2020 Feb; 13(2):e006661. PubMed ID: 32059628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: pharmacologic and mechanical hemodynamic support pathways.
    Graf T; Desch S; Eitel I; Thiele H
    Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Sep; 26(6):535-44. PubMed ID: 25968304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Mandawat A; Rao SV
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28500136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revascularisation and mechanical circulatory support in patients with ischaemic cardiogenic shock.
    Maznyczka AM; Ford TJ; Oldroyd KG
    Heart; 2019 Sep; 105(17):1364-1374. PubMed ID: 31129613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Practical Approach to Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Interventional Perspective.
    Atkinson TM; Ohman EM; O'Neill WW; Rab T; Cigarroa JE;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):871-83. PubMed ID: 27151604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Review of percutaneous mechanical support devices and strategies.
    Dudzinsk JE; Gnall E; Kowey PR
    Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2018 Mar; 19(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 31032599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.