333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26586822)
1. Structural Organization of the Corpus Callosum Predicts Attentional Shifts after Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation.
Chechlacz M; Humphreys GW; Sotiropoulos SN; Kennard C; Cazzoli D
J Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 35(46):15353-68. PubMed ID: 26586822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Callosal anisotropy predicts attentional network changes after parietal inhibitory stimulation.
Schintu S; Cunningham CA; Freedberg M; Taylor P; Gotts SJ; Shomstein S; Wassermann EM
Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117559. PubMed ID: 33189929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A matter of hand: Causal links between hand dominance, structural organization of fronto-parietal attention networks, and variability in behavioural responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Cazzoli D; Chechlacz M
Cortex; 2017 Jan; 86():230-246. PubMed ID: 27405259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mapping visuospatial attention: the greyscales task in combination with repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Giglhuber K; Maurer S; Zimmer C; Meyer B; Krieg SM
BMC Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 19(1):40. PubMed ID: 29996777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing the inter-hemispheric competition account of visual extinction with combined TMS/fMRI.
Petitet P; Noonan MP; Bridge H; O'Reilly JX; O'Shea J
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():63-73. PubMed ID: 25911128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Theta burst stimulation improves overt visual search in spatial neglect independently of attentional load.
Cazzoli D; Rosenthal CR; Kennard C; Zito GA; Hopfner S; Müri RM; Nyffeler T
Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():317-29. PubMed ID: 26547867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evoking visual neglect-like deficits in healthy volunteers - an investigation by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Giglhuber K; Maurer S; Zimmer C; Meyer B; Krieg SM
Brain Imaging Behav; 2017 Feb; 11(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 26781482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local Immediate versus Long-Range Delayed Changes in Functional Connectivity Following rTMS on the Visual Attention Network.
Battelli L; Grossman ED; Plow EB
Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 27838275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Concurrent TMS-fMRI Reveals Interactions between Dorsal and Ventral Attentional Systems.
Leitão J; Thielscher A; Tünnerhoff J; Noppeney U
J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 35(32):11445-57. PubMed ID: 26269649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contributions of human parietal and frontal cortices to attentional control during conflict resolution: a 1-Hz offline rTMS study.
Jin Y; Olk B; Hilgetag CC
Exp Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 205(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 20617309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influences of Long-Term Memory-Guided Attention and Stimulus-Guided Attention on Visuospatial Representations within Human Intraparietal Sulcus.
Rosen ML; Stern CE; Michalka SW; Devaney KJ; Somers DC
J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 35(32):11358-63. PubMed ID: 26269642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perturbation of visuospatial attention by high-frequency offline rTMS.
Jin Y; Hilgetag CC
Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 189(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18563400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential contribution of right and left parietal cortex to the control of spatial attention: a simultaneous EEG-rTMS study.
Capotosto P; Babiloni C; Romani GL; Corbetta M
Cereb Cortex; 2012 Feb; 22(2):446-54. PubMed ID: 21666126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interhemispheric balance of overt attention: a theta burst stimulation study.
Cazzoli D; Wurtz P; Müri RM; Hess CW; Nyffeler T
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 29(6):1271-6. PubMed ID: 19302162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of inhibitory theta burst TMS to different brain sites involved in visuospatial attention - a combined neuronavigated cTBS and behavioural study.
Platz T; Schüttauf J; Aschenbach J; Mengdehl C; Lotze M
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2016; 34(2):271-85. PubMed ID: 26923615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dissociation of neglect subtypes with transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Ghacibeh GA; Shenker JI; Winter KH; Triggs WJ; Heilman KM
Neurology; 2007 Sep; 69(11):1122-7. PubMed ID: 17846411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frontal eye fields control attentional modulation of alpha and gamma oscillations in contralateral occipitoparietal cortex.
Marshall TR; O'Shea J; Jensen O; Bergmann TO
J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(4):1638-47. PubMed ID: 25632139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. fMRI-guided TMS on cortical eye fields: the frontal but not intraparietal eye fields regulate the coupling between visuospatial attention and eye movements.
Van Ettinger-Veenstra HM; Huijbers W; Gutteling TP; Vink M; Kenemans JL; Neggers SF
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 102(6):3469-80. PubMed ID: 19812293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of rTMS conditioning over the fronto-parietal network on motor versus visual attention.
Rounis E; Yarrow K; Rothwell JC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 19(3):513-24. PubMed ID: 17335398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
