These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26587687)

  • 1. Multisensory teamwork: using a tactile or an auditory display to exchange gaze information improves performance in joint visual search.
    Wahn B; Schwandt J; Krüger M; Crafa D; Nunnendorf V; König P
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):781-95. PubMed ID: 26587687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario.
    Hopkins K; Kass SJ; Blalock LD; Brill JC
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 27267493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supporting interruption management and multimodal interface design: three meta-analyses of task performance as a function of interrupting task modality.
    Lu SA; Wickens CD; Prinet JC; Hutchins SD; Sarter N; Sebok A
    Hum Factors; 2013 Aug; 55(4):697-724. PubMed ID: 23964412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When to use vibrotactile displays? A meta-analysis for the role of vibrotactile displays in human-computer interaction.
    Chai C; Shi J; Wu C; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Liao J
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Sep; 103():103802. PubMed ID: 35623202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual, auditory and tactile stimuli compete for early sensory processing capacities within but not between senses.
    Porcu E; Keitel C; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 97():224-35. PubMed ID: 24736186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early auditory change detection implicitly facilitated by ignored concurrent visual change during a Braille reading task.
    Aoyama A; Haruyama T; Kuriki S
    J Integr Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 12(3):385-99. PubMed ID: 24070061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye-gaze independent EEG-based brain-computer interfaces for communication.
    Riccio A; Mattia D; Simione L; Olivetti M; Cincotti F
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Aug; 9(4):045001. PubMed ID: 22831893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Isolating the neural mechanisms of interference during continuous multisensory dual-task performance.
    Kasper RW; Cecotti H; Touryan J; Eckstein MP; Giesbrecht B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 24047391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Continuously informing vibrotactile displays in support of attention management and multitasking in anesthesiology.
    Ferris TK; Sarter N
    Hum Factors; 2011 Dec; 53(6):600-11. PubMed ID: 22235523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sustained Attention in Auditory and Visual Monitoring Tasks: Evaluation of the Administration of a Rest Break or Exogenous Vibrotactile Signals.
    Arrabito GR; Ho G; Aghaei B; Burns C; Hou M
    Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1403-16. PubMed ID: 26276365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory, visual, and bimodal data link displays and how they support pilot performance.
    Steelman KS; Talleur D; Carbonari R; Yamani Y; Nunes A; McCarley JS
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2013 Jun; 84(6):560-6. PubMed ID: 23745283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using multisensory cues to facilitate air traffic management.
    Ngo MK; Pierce RS; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Dec; 54(6):1093-103. PubMed ID: 23397817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tactile, Visual, and Crossmodal Visual-Tactile Change Blindness: The Effect of Transient Type and Task Demands.
    Riggs SL; Sarter N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 30566845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of auditory and tactile warning on response to visual hazards under a noisy environment.
    Murata A; Kuroda T; Karwowski W
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():58-67. PubMed ID: 28166900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
    Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multisensory integration: frequency tuning of audio-tactile integration.
    Foxe JJ
    Curr Biol; 2009 May; 19(9):R373-5. PubMed ID: 19439261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Body-environment integration: Temporal processing of tactile and auditory inputs along the schizophrenia continuum.
    Di Cosmo G; Costantini M; Ambrosini E; Salone A; Martinotti G; Corbo M; Di Giannantonio M; Ferri F
    J Psychiatr Res; 2021 Feb; 134():208-214. PubMed ID: 33418447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensory modality-specific spatio-temporal dynamics in response to counting tasks.
    Gohel B; Jeong Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Oct; 581():20-5. PubMed ID: 25130313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.