463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26587927)
1. Prostate Cancer: Utility of Whole-Lesion Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Metrics for Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
Rosenkrantz AB; Ream JM; Nolan P; Rusinek H; Deng FM; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1208-14. PubMed ID: 26587927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.
Rozenberg R; Thornhill RE; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Lim C; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):775-82. PubMed ID: 27003049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Apparent diffusion coefficient value and ratio as noninvasive potential biomarkers to predict prostate cancer grading: comparison with prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen.
De Cobelli F; Ravelli S; Esposito A; Giganti F; Gallina A; Montorsi F; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):550-7. PubMed ID: 25714284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient metrics as a marker of percentage Gleason 4 component within Gleason 7 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Rosenkrantz AB; Triolo MJ; Melamed J; Rusinek H; Taneja SS; Deng FM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Mar; 41(3):708-14. PubMed ID: 24616064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy.
Lista F; Gimbernat H; Cáceres F; Rodríguez-Barbero JM; Castillo E; Angulo JC
Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Jun; 38(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 24387827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-small cell lung cancer: Whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient for assessment of tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion and pleural invasion.
Tsuchiya N; Doai M; Usuda K; Uramoto H; Tonami H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172433. PubMed ID: 28207858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Donati OF; Mazaheri Y; Afaq A; Vargas HA; Zheng J; Moskowitz CS; Hricak H; Akin O
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 24475824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of diffusional kurtosis imaging as a marker of adverse pathologic outcomes among prostate cancer active surveillance candidates undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Rosenkrantz AB; Prabhu V; Sigmund EE; Babb JS; Deng FM; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):840-6. PubMed ID: 24059373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostatectomy.
Verma S; Rajesh A; Morales H; Lemen L; Bills G; Delworth M; Gaitonde K; Ying J; Samartunga R; Lamba M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 21257890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative prediction of neurovascular bundle involvement of localized prostate cancer by combined T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging of magnetic resonance imaging, number of positive biopsy cores, and Gleason score.
Naiki T; Okamura T; Nagata D; Mori Y; Kawai N; Ogawa K; Akita H; Hashimoto Y; Tozawa K; Kohri K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 21790224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer.
Gupta RT; Kauffman CR; Garcia-Reyes K; Palmeri ML; Madden JF; Polascik TJ; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 26204283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Using ADC and ADC Ratio in Determining Gleason Score.
Woo S; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 27077643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient analysis for predicting outcomes of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.
Tamada T; Dani H; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Sep; 42(9):2340-2345. PubMed ID: 28396920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness by Use of the Combination of Quantitative DWI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
Hötker AM; Mazaheri Y; Aras Ö; Zheng J; Moskowitz CS; Gondo T; Matsumoto K; Hricak H; Akin O
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 26900904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer Using the Combination of Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Across Tumor Diffusion Volume and Clinical Information: A Pilot Study.
Zhang Z; Xu H; Xue Y; Li J; Ye Q
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):556-564. PubMed ID: 30173421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk stratification of patients with extraprostatic extension and negative lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy: identifying optimal candidates for adjuvant therapy.
Eisenberg MS; Karnes RJ; Kaushik D; Rangel L; Bergstralh EJ; Boorjian SA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1735-41. PubMed ID: 23727312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of observation size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in PI-RADS v2.1 assessment category 4 and 5 observations compared to adverse pathological outcomes.
Abreu-Gomez J; Walker D; Alotaibi T; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Schieda N
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4251-4261. PubMed ID: 32211965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score.
Hansen J; Bianchi M; Sun M; Rink M; Castiglione F; Abdollah F; Steuber T; Ahyai SA; Steurer S; Göbel C; Freschi M; Montorsi F; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Briganti A; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2014 Mar; 113(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 24053339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
