These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26588194)

  • 41. Gross anatomy videos: student satisfaction, usage, and effect on student performance in a condensed curriculum.
    Topping DB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 24106107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Does attendance at anatomy practical classes correlate with assessment outcome? A retrospective study of a large cohort of undergraduate anatomy students.
    Gonsalvez DG; Ovens M; Ivanusic J
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Dec; 15():231. PubMed ID: 26698839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of Dental Students' Self-Directed, Faculty, and Software-Based Assessments of Dental Anatomy Wax-Ups: A Retrospective Study.
    Garrett PH; Faraone KL; Patzelt SB; Keaser ML
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1437-44. PubMed ID: 26632298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Undergraduate coursework in anatomy as a predictor of performance: comparison between students taking a medical gross anatomy course of average length and a course shortened by curriculum reform.
    Peterson CA; Tucker RP
    Clin Anat; 2005 Oct; 18(7):540-7. PubMed ID: 16015636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Head to head: The role of academic competition in undergraduate anatomical education.
    Van Nuland SE; Roach VA; Wilson TD; Belliveau DJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 25319077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessing student engagement and self-regulated learning in a medical gross anatomy course.
    Pizzimenti MA; Axelson RD
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 24845421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Independent learning modules enhance student performance and understanding of anatomy.
    Serrat MA; Dom AM; Buchanan JT; Williams AR; Efaw ML; Richardson LL
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(5):406-16. PubMed ID: 24616425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Performance in a prematriculation gross anatomy course as a predictor of performance in medical school.
    Tucker RP
    Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 19177416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Training tomorrow's anatomists today: a partnership approach.
    Fraher JP; Evans DJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 19434686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Testing knowledge of human gross anatomy in medical school: an applied contextual-learning theory method.
    Clough RW; Lehr RP
    Clin Anat; 1996; 9(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 8793222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Using checklists in a gross anatomy laboratory improves learning outcomes and dissection quality.
    Hofer RE; Nikolaus OB; Pawlina W
    Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 21786427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: Effects on achievement and cognitive load.
    Küçük S; Kapakin S; Göktaş Y
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):411-21. PubMed ID: 26950521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Do they know too little? An inter-institutional study on the anatomical knowledge of upper-year medical students based on multiple choice questions of a progress test.
    Brunk I; Schauber S; Georg W
    Ann Anat; 2017 Jan; 209():93-100. PubMed ID: 27746222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students.
    Kerby J; Shukur ZN; Shalhoub J
    Clin Anat; 2011 May; 24(4):489-97. PubMed ID: 20949485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Anatomy correlations: introducing clinical skills to improve performance in anatomy.
    Dusseau J; Knutson D; Way D
    Fam Med; 2008 Oct; 40(9):633-7. PubMed ID: 18830838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. How much anatomy is enough?
    Bergman EM; Prince KJ; Drukker J; van der Vleuten CP; Scherpbier AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 19177406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. MBBS student perceptions about physiology subject teaching and objective structured practical examination based formative assessment for improving competencies.
    Lakshmipathy K
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Sep; 39(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 26330038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Curricular response to increase recall and transfer of anatomical knowledge into the obstetrics/gynecology clerkship.
    Jurjus RA; Brown K; Goldman E; Galoosian A; Butera G; Krapf JM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 26588426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Design, implementation, and evaluation of an innovative anatomy course.
    Rizzolo LJ; Rando WC; O'Brien MK; Haims AH; Abrahams JJ; Stewart WB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(3):109-20. PubMed ID: 20496432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Predictive validity of measurements of clinical competence using the team objective structured bedside assessment (TOSBA): assessing the clinical competence of final year medical students.
    Meagher FM; Butler MW; Miller SD; Costello RW; Conroy RM; McElvaney NG
    Med Teach; 2009 Nov; 31(11):e545-50. PubMed ID: 19909034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.