These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26588593)

  • 1. The design-by-treatment interaction model: a unifying framework for modelling loop inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Jackson D; Boddington P; White IR
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 26588593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    van Valkenhoef G; Dias S; Ades AE; Welton NJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 26461181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical evidence about inconsistency among studies in a pair-wise meta-analysis.
    Rhodes KM; Turner RM; Higgins JP
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):346-370. PubMed ID: 26679486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating network meta-analysis and inconsistency using arm-parameterized model in structural equation modeling.
    Shih MC; Tu YK
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):240-254. PubMed ID: 30834677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new approach to evaluating loop inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Turner RM; Band T; Morris TP; Fisher DJ; Higgins JPT; Carpenter JR; White IR
    Stat Med; 2023 Nov; 42(27):4917-4930. PubMed ID: 37767752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.
    Efthimiou O; Debray TP; van Valkenhoef G; Trelle S; Panayidou K; Moons KG; Reitsma JB; Shang A; Salanti G;
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):236-63. PubMed ID: 26754852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies.
    Higgins JP; Jackson D; Barrett JK; Lu G; Ades AE; White IR
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Jun; 3(2):98-110. PubMed ID: 26062084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'Arm-based' parameterization for network meta-analysis.
    Hawkins N; Scott DA; Woods B
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 26610409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unsolved issues of mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: network size and inconsistency.
    Sturtz S; Bender R
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Dec; 3(4):300-11. PubMed ID: 26053423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Node-Splitting Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Evaluation of Inconsistency in Network Meta-Analysis.
    Yu-Kang T
    Value Health; 2016 Dec; 19(8):957-963. PubMed ID: 27987646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying indirect evidence in network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Tanaka S; Matsui S; Cipriani A; Furukawa TA
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):917-927. PubMed ID: 27917493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis.
    Spineli LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 31018836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling time-course relationships with multiple treatments: Model-based network meta-analysis for continuous summary outcomes.
    Pedder H; Dias S; Bennetts M; Boucher M; Welton NJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):267-286. PubMed ID: 31013000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models to Evaluate Inconsistency within a Network Meta-Analysis.
    Tu YK
    Value Health; 2015 Dec; 18(8):1120-5. PubMed ID: 26686799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Basics of meta-analysis: I
    Borenstein M; Higgins JP; Hedges LV; Rothstein HR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 28058794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Law M; Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 27465416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analysis.
    Efthimiou O; Mavridis D; Debray TP; Samara M; Belger M; Siontis GC; Leucht S; Salanti G;
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1210-1226. PubMed ID: 28083901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations.
    Sheng Z; Kong W; Cortina JM; Hou S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27286903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.