These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82. Understanding HEDIS (Health Employer Data Information Set) can help providers attract health plan contracts. Stout NJ Health Care Strateg Manage; 1994 Aug; 12(8):14. PubMed ID: 10136296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
83. Assessing quality of care: new twists from managed care. Morreim EH J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 10633279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
85. Rehabilitation program evaluation using a revised level of rehabilitation scale (LORS-II). Carey RG; Posavac EJ Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1982 Aug; 63(8):367-70. PubMed ID: 7115029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. The critical path method alone does nothing to improve performance. Luttman RJ QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1993 May; 19(5):142-3. PubMed ID: 8380015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
87. Toward a uniform assessment of "outcome". Feigenson JS Stroke; 1982; 13(6):873-6. PubMed ID: 7147308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
88. The Kaiser Permanente Northern California Story: Improving Hypertension Control From 44% to 90% in 13 Years (2000 to 2013). Jaffe MG; Young JD J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2016 Apr; 18(4):260-1. PubMed ID: 26939059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
89. South Australian stroke rehabilitation outcome study. Shah S; Cooper B Stroke; 1991 Nov; 22(11):1464-5. PubMed ID: 1750058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
90. The role of rehabilitation medicine in the delivery of health care. Lippmann HI J Med Soc N J; 1974 Sep; 71(9):677-81. PubMed ID: 4528061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
91. Reliability of level of care decisions in a long-term care program. Stark AJ; Gutman GM; Brothers K J Community Health; 1982; 8(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 6820024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
92. Uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1995. Fiedler RC; Granger CV Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1997; 76(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 9036916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
93. Validity of outcome following stroke rehabilitation. Vanclay F; Shah S Arch Neurol; 1989 Dec; 46(12):1270-1. PubMed ID: 2590009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
95. Obstacles on the information highway. Armstrong R; Gregory A Med J Aust; 2013 Feb; 198(3):123. PubMed ID: 23418679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
96. Severe stroke: a carer's viewpoint. Cox RL Med J Aust; 1996 Mar; 164(6):375-6. PubMed ID: 8606666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
97. Fundamentals of performance measurement. Johnson K Health Aff (Millwood); 1998; 17(6):253-4. PubMed ID: 9916374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
98. Stroke data banks. McAlister NH; Chipman M Stroke; 1987; 18(1):273-4. PubMed ID: 3810765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
99. A Comprehensive Review of Physical Therapy Interventions for Stroke Rehabilitation: Impairment-Based Approaches and Functional Goals. Shahid J; Kashif A; Shahid MK Brain Sci; 2023 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 37239189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]