320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26590029)
1. Biofilm formation affects surface properties of novel bioactive glass-containing composites.
Hyun HK; Salehi S; Ferracane JL
Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1599-608. PubMed ID: 26590029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of biofilm formation on the optical properties of novel bioactive glass-containing composites.
Hyun HK; Ferracane JL
Dent Mater; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1144-51. PubMed ID: 27394086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures.
Cazzaniga G; Ottobelli M; Ionescu AC; Paolone G; Gherlone E; Ferracane JL; Brambilla E
J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():43-52. PubMed ID: 28750776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of surface roughness of composite resin on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans in the presence of saliva.
Park JW; Song CW; Jung JH; Ahn SJ; Ferracane JL
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 22339385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations.
Khvostenko D; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 26621028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface.
Nedeljkovic I; De Munck J; Ungureanu AA; Slomka V; Bartic C; Vananroye A; Clasen C; Teughels W; Van Meerbeek B; Van Landuyt KL
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():36-43. PubMed ID: 28554609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Ren Y
Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites.
Kantorski KZ; Scotti R; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
Gen Dent; 2008; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems.
Ergücü Z; Türkün LS
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 17427829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and release of fluoride from experimental resin-based composites depending on surface treatment and S-PRG filler particle fraction.
Hahnel S; Wastl DS; Schneider-Feyrer S; Giessibl FJ; Brambilla E; Cazzaniga G; Ionescu A
J Adhes Dent; 2014 Aug; 16(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 24669368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites.
Beyth N; Bahir R; Matalon S; Domb AJ; Weiss EI
Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):732-6. PubMed ID: 17897707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Properties of dental resins submitted to pH catalysed hydrolysis.
Cilli R; Pereira JC; Prakki A
J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 23022104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of surface properties of resin-based composites on in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm development.
Ionescu A; Wutscher E; Brambilla E; Schneider-Feyrer S; Giessibl FJ; Hahnel S
Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Oct; 120(5):458-65. PubMed ID: 22985005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between surface roughness and microhardness of experimental composites with varying filler concentration.
Munchow EA; Correa MB; Ogliari FA; Piva E; Zanchi CH
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 May; 13(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 22918000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites.
Antonson SA; Yazici AR; Kilinc E; Antonson DE; Hardigan PC
J Dent; 2011 Jul; 39 Suppl 1():e9-17. PubMed ID: 21256180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antibacterial dental composites with chlorhexidine and mesoporous silica.
Zhang JF; Wu R; Fan Y; Liao S; Wang Y; Wen ZT; Xu X
J Dent Res; 2014 Dec; 93(12):1283-9. PubMed ID: 25319365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of biofilm exposure on marginal integrity of composite restorations.
Mushashe AM; de Almeida SA; Ferracane JL; Merritt J; Correr GM
Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):201-205. PubMed ID: 32794395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationships between composite roughness and Streptococcus mutans biofilm depth under shear in vitro.
O'Brien EP; Mondal K; Chen CC; Hanley L; Drummond JL; Rockne KJ
J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104535. PubMed ID: 37156358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation.
Ono M; Nikaido T; Ikeda M; Imai S; Hanada N; Tagami J; Matin K
Dent Mater J; 2007 Sep; 26(5):613-22. PubMed ID: 18203458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
