These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26590044)

  • 21. Fundamentals of neurosurgery: virtual reality tasks for training and evaluation of technical skills.
    Choudhury N; Gélinas-Phaneuf N; Delorme S; Del Maestro R
    World Neurosurg; 2013 Nov; 80(5):e9-19. PubMed ID: 23178917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use of simulation procedural training to improve self-efficacy, knowledge, and skill to perform cricothyroidotomy.
    Jayaraman V; Feeney JM; Brautigam RT; Burns KJ; Jacobs LM
    Am Surg; 2014 Apr; 80(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 24887669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differentiating levels of surgical experience on a virtual reality temporal bone simulator.
    Zhao YC; Kennedy G; Hall R; O'Leary S
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Nov; 143(5 Suppl 3):S30-5. PubMed ID: 20970690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Basic laparoscopic training using the Simbionix LAP Mentor: setting the standards in the novice group.
    von Websky MW; Vitz M; Raptis DA; Rosenthal R; Clavien PA; Hahnloser D
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(4):459-67. PubMed ID: 22677582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using a virtual reality temporal bone simulator to assess otolaryngology trainees.
    Zirkle M; Roberson DW; Leuwer R; Dubrowski A
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Feb; 117(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 17204992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator--role as an assessment tool?
    Lee JY; Mucksavage P; Kerbl DC; Huynh VB; Etafy M; McDougall EM
    J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):998-1002. PubMed ID: 22264455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The use of virtual reality simulation to determine potential for endoscopic surgery skill acquisition.
    Mann T; Gillinder L; Szold A
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2014 Aug; 23(4):190-7. PubMed ID: 24794855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and LapVR evaluation metrics may not correlate with operative performance in a novice cohort.
    Steigerwald SN; Park J; Hardy KM; Gillman L; Vergis AS
    Med Educ Online; 2015; 20():30024. PubMed ID: 26641071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. High correlation between performance on a virtual-reality simulator and real-life cataract surgery.
    Thomsen AS; Smith P; Subhi Y; Cour M; Tang L; Saleh GM; Konge L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 95(3):307-311. PubMed ID: 27679989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new strategy for difficult airway management with visual needle cricothyroidotomy: a manikin study.
    Feng Y; Deng H; Liu X; Xu G; Huang Z; Yan B; Liu Y; Lv J; Zhang Y; Guo R
    Am J Emerg Med; 2014 Nov; 32(11):1391-4. PubMed ID: 25224024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.
    Diesen DL; Erhunmwunsee L; Bennett KM; Ben-David K; Yurcisin B; Ceppa EP; Omotosho PA; Perez A; Pryor A
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21708364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of the McGill simulator for endoscopic sinus surgery: a new high-fidelity virtual reality simulator for endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Varshney R; Frenkiel S; Nguyen LH; Young M; Del Maestro R; Zeitouni A; Tewfik MA;
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2014; 28(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 25197920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator is lacking in construct validity.
    Wijn RP; Persoon MC; Schout BM; Martens EJ; Scherpbier AJ; Hendrikx AJ
    J Endourol; 2010 Jan; 24(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 19954352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing surgical skill training under hazardous conditions in a virtual environment.
    Scerbo MW; Bliss JP; Schmidt EA; Hanner-Bailey HS; Weireter LJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():436-42. PubMed ID: 15718774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effectiveness, usability, and acceptability of haptic-enabled virtual reality and mannequin modality simulators for surgical cricothyroidotomy.
    Proctor MD; Campbell-Wynn L
    Mil Med; 2014 Mar; 179(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 24594459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Emergent surgical airway: comparison of the three-step method and conventional cricothyroidotomy utilizing high-fidelity simulation.
    Quick JA; MacIntyre AD; Barnes SL
    J Emerg Med; 2014 Feb; 46(2):304-7. PubMed ID: 24188608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shoulder arthroscopy simulator performance correlates with resident and shoulder arthroscopy experience.
    Martin KD; Cameron K; Belmont PJ; Schoenfeld A; Owens BD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(21):e160. PubMed ID: 23138247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Testing manual dexterity using a virtual reality simulator: reliability and validity.
    Ben-Gal G; Weiss EI; Gafni N; Ziv A
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2013 Aug; 17(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 23815690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Proficiency performance benchmarks for removal of simulated brain tumors using a virtual reality simulator NeuroTouch.
    AlZhrani G; Alotaibi F; Azarnoush H; Winkler-Schwartz A; Sabbagh A; Bajunaid K; Lajoie SP; Del Maestro RF
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(4):685-96. PubMed ID: 25687956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Individual skill progression on a virtual reality simulator for shoulder arthroscopy: a 3-year follow-up study.
    Gomoll AH; Pappas G; Forsythe B; Warner JJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Jun; 36(6):1139-42. PubMed ID: 18326032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.