These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26590921)

  • 1. Evaluating Left-Censored Data Through Substitution, Parametric, Semi-parametric, and Nonparametric Methods: A Simulation Study.
    Tekindal MA; Erdoğan BD; Yavuz Y
    Interdiscip Sci; 2017 Jun; 9(2):153-172. PubMed ID: 26590921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
    Ganser GH; Hewett P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods for Handling Left-Censored Data in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
    Canales RA; Wilson AM; Pearce-Walker JI; Verhougstraete MP; Reynolds KA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30120116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
    Zhao Y; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the mean and standard deviation of environmental data with below detection limit observations: Considering highly skewed data and model misspecification.
    Shoari N; Dubé JS; Chenouri S
    Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():599-608. PubMed ID: 26210025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of methods for analyzing left-censored occupational exposure data.
    Huynh T; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Monteiro J; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Nov; 58(9):1126-42. PubMed ID: 25261453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of parametric and semi-parametric models with randomly right-censored data by weighted estimators: Two applications in colon cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma datasets.
    Yenilmez İ; Yılmaz E; Kantar YM; Aydın D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Feb; 31(2):372-387. PubMed ID: 34903099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of the impact of left-censored soil contamination data on the uncertainty of descriptive statistical parameters.
    Shoari N; Dubé JS
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2623-2631. PubMed ID: 26946089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different parametric proportional hazards models for interval-censored data: a simulation study.
    Gong Q; Fang L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 23916917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of statistical treatments of left-censored environmental data using coincident uncensored data sets: I. Summary statistics.
    Antweiler RC; Taylor HE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(10):3732-8. PubMed ID: 18546715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of the β-Substitution Method and a Bayesian Method for Analyzing Left-Censored Data.
    Huynh T; Quick H; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jan; 60(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 26209598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Censoring Trace-Level Environmental Data: Statistical Analysis Considerations to Limit Bias.
    George BJ; Gains-Germain L; Broms K; Black K; Furman M; Hays MD; Thomas KW; Simmons JE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 55(6):3786-3795. PubMed ID: 33625843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Statistical Treatments of Left-Censored Environmental Data Using Coincident Uncensored Data Sets. II. Group Comparisons.
    Antweiler RC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(22):13439-46. PubMed ID: 26490190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Method of median semi-variance for the analysis of left-censored data: comparison with other techniques using environmental data.
    Zoffoli HJ; Varella CA; do Amaral-Sobrinho NM; Zonta E; Tolón-Becerra A
    Chemosphere; 2013 Nov; 93(9):1701-9. PubMed ID: 23830887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.
    Willems S; Schat A; van Noorden MS; Fiocco M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):323-335. PubMed ID: 26988930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The MLE of the uniform distribution with right-censored data.
    Yu Q
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2021 Oct; 27(4):662-678. PubMed ID: 34304307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A robust semi-parametric warping estimator of the survivor function with an application to two-group comparisons.
    Hutson AD
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):384-397. PubMed ID: 26988931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distribution-based maximum likelihood estimation methods are preferred for estimating Salmonella concentration in chicken when contamination data are highly left-censored.
    Sun T; Liu Y; Gao S; Qin X; Lin Z; Dou X; Wang X; Zhang H; Dong Q
    Food Microbiol; 2023 Aug; 113():104283. PubMed ID: 37098436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interval-specific censoring set adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimator.
    Wu Y; Kolassa J
    J Appl Stat; 2024; 51(12):2436-2456. PubMed ID: 39267713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.