These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26591459)

  • 21. Degradation and dispersion limit environmental DNA detection of rare amphibians in wetlands: Increasing efficacy of sampling designs.
    Goldberg CS; Strickler KM; Fremier AK
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Aug; 633():695-703. PubMed ID: 29602110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Environmental DNA analysis of river herring in Chesapeake Bay: A powerful tool for monitoring threatened keystone species.
    Plough LV; Ogburn MB; Fitzgerald CL; Geranio R; Marafino GA; Richie KD
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0205578. PubMed ID: 30383750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantifying environmental DNA signals for aquatic invasive species across multiple detection platforms.
    Nathan LM; Simmons M; Wegleitner BJ; Jerde CL; Mahon AR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(21):12800-6. PubMed ID: 25299381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Environmental DNA (eDNA) detects the invasive rusty crayfish
    Dougherty MM; Larson ER; Renshaw MA; Gantz CA; Egan SP; Erickson DM; Lodge DM
    J Appl Ecol; 2016 Jun; 53(3):722-732. PubMed ID: 27773942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development and Validation of Environmental DNA (eDNA) Markers for Detection of Freshwater Turtles.
    Davy CM; Kidd AG; Wilson CC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130965. PubMed ID: 26200348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection limits of quantitative and digital PCR assays and their influence in presence-absence surveys of environmental DNA.
    Hunter ME; Dorazio RM; Butterfield JS; Meigs-Friend G; Nico LG; Ferrante JA
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):221-229. PubMed ID: 27768244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fine-tuning for the tropics: application of eDNA technology for invasive fish detection in tropical freshwater ecosystems.
    Robson HL; Noble TH; Saunders RJ; Robson SK; Burrows DW; Jerry DR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jul; 16(4):922-32. PubMed ID: 26849294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Application of environmental DNA to detect an endangered marine skate species in the wild.
    Weltz K; Lyle JM; Ovenden J; Morgan JAT; Moreno DA; Semmens JM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178124. PubMed ID: 28591215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using
    Ponce JJ; Arismendi I; Thomas A
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11835. PubMed ID: 34434646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using eDNA to detect the distribution and density of invasive crayfish in the Honghe-Hani rice terrace World Heritage site.
    Cai W; Ma Z; Yang C; Wang L; Wang W; Zhao G; Geng Y; Yu DW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177724. PubMed ID: 28505200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Repurposing environmental DNA samples-detecting the western pearlshell (
    Dysthe JC; Rodgers T; Franklin TW; Carim KJ; Young MK; McKelvey KS; Mock KE; Schwartz MK
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Mar; 8(5):2659-2670. PubMed ID: 29531684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inference of genetic marker concentrations from field surveys to detect environmental DNA using Bayesian updating.
    Schultz MT
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190603. PubMed ID: 29381694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modeling the Sensitivity of Field Surveys for Detection of Environmental DNA (eDNA).
    Schultz MT; Lance RF
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0141503. PubMed ID: 26509674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detecting the movement and spawning activity of bigheaded carps with environmental DNA.
    Erickson RA; Rees CB; Coulter AA; Merkes CM; McCalla SG; Touzinsky KF; Walleser L; Goforth RR; Amberg JJ
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jul; 16(4):957-65. PubMed ID: 27087387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Environmental DNA detection of endangered and invasive species in Kejimkujik National Park and Historic Site.
    Loeza-Quintana T; Crookes S; Li PY; Reid DP; Smith M; Hanner RH
    Genome; 2021 Mar; 64(3):172-180. PubMed ID: 33186067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing environmental DNA detection in controlled lentic systems.
    Moyer GR; Díaz-Ferguson E; Hill JE; Shea C
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e103767. PubMed ID: 25079969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combining surface and soil environmental DNA with artificial cover objects to improve terrestrial reptile survey detection.
    Kyle KE; Allen MC; Dragon J; Bunnell JF; Reinert HK; Zappalorti R; Jaffe BD; Angle JC; Lockwood JL
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Dec; 36(6):e13939. PubMed ID: 35603473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. eDNA-based detection reveals invasion risks of a biofouling bivalve in the world's largest water diversion project.
    Xia Z; Gu J; Wen Y; Cao X; Gao Y; Li S; Haffner GD; MacIsaac HJ; Zhan A
    Ecol Appl; 2024 Jan; 34(1):e2826. PubMed ID: 36840509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection.
    Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Detecting an elusive invasive species: a diagnostic PCR to detect Burmese python in Florida waters and an assessment of persistence of environmental DNA.
    Piaggio AJ; Engeman RM; Hopken MW; Humphrey JS; Keacher KL; Bruce WE; Avery ML
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Mar; 14(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 24119154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.