169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26591634)
1. RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF INVASIVE CERVICAL CANCER AT THE DEPARTMENT OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS IN NOVI SAD IN THE PERIOD 1993-2013.
Đurđević S; Stojanović S; Pantelić M; Nikolić D; Basta Nikolić M; Mocko Kaćanski M
Med Pregl; 2015; 68(7-8):227-33. PubMed ID: 26591634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intratumoral lymphatic vessel density and clinicopathologic features of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy.
Zaganelli FL; Carvalho FM; Almeida BG; Bacchi CE; Goes JC; Calil MA; Baracat EC; Carvalho JP
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1225-31. PubMed ID: 21135594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival of women with microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix is not improved by radical surgery.
Bean LM; Ward KK; Plaxe SC; McHale MT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):332.e1-332.e6. PubMed ID: 28522318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical pathologic factors that predict recurrence in stage IB and IIA cervical carcinoma patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes.
Samlal RA; van der Velden J; Ten Kate FJ; Schilthuis MS; Hart AA; Lammes FB
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 80(7):1234-40. PubMed ID: 9317173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
Casarin J; Bogani G; Papadia A; Ditto A; Pinelli C; Garzon S; Donadello N; Laganà AS; Cromi A; Mueller M; Raspagliesi F; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 32320800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modified type IV-V radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of patients with stage III cervical carcinoma. Feasibility, technique, and clinical results.
Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; Cutillo G; Greggi S; Salerno MG; Amoroso M; Scambia G; Mancuso S
Cancer; 1996 Dec; 78(11):2359-65. PubMed ID: 8941007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Treatment of cervical cancer in the Republic of Srpska].
Lucić N; Antonić Z; Ećim V; Draganović D; Latinović L
Med Pregl; 2011; 64(11-12):588-91. PubMed ID: 22369006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Significance of the absolute number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in predicting postoperative survival for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA2 to IIA cervical cancer.
Chen Y; Zhang L; Tian J; Fu X; Ren X; Hao Q
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jan; 23(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23221732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The Wertheim-Meigs radical hysterectomy in surgical treatment of cervical carcinoma].
Durdević S; Visnjevac V; Kermeci K
Med Pregl; 2001; 54(9-10):465-9. PubMed ID: 11876009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up.
Spirtos NM; Eisenkop SM; Schlaerth JB; Ballon SC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 187(2):340-8. PubMed ID: 12193922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.
Frumovitz M; Obermair A; Coleman RL; Pareja R; Lopez A; Ribero R; Isla D; Rendon G; Bernardini MQ; Buda A; Moretti-Marquez R; Zevallos A; Vieira MA; Zhu T; Land RP; Nicklin J; Asher R; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Ramirez PT
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Jun; 21(6):851-860. PubMed ID: 32502445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix--3 years' experience].
Bosković V; Glisić A; Petković S
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(5-6):183-7. PubMed ID: 9863378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analysis of lymph node status and lymph node morphology in cervix cancer operated by the Wertheim-Meigs-Okabayashi method].
Geppert M; Smyczek-Gargya B; Dekorsy A; König PA
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1992; 114(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 1595306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
