These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26592212)

  • 1. Goodness-of-fit test for meta-analysis.
    Chen Z; Zhang G; Li J
    Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16983. PubMed ID: 26592212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A random effects meta-analysis model with Box-Cox transformation.
    Yamaguchi Y; Maruo K; Partlett C; Riley RD
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):109. PubMed ID: 28724350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A graphical approach to assess the goodness-of-fit of random-effects linear models when the goal is to measure individual benefits of medical treatments in severely ill patients.
    Wang Z; Diaz FJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):193. PubMed ID: 32689939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study.
    Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing goodness of fit of a uniform truncation model.
    Mandel M; Betensky RA
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 17688493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Goodness of fit tools for dose-response meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
    Discacciati A; Crippa A; Orsini N
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):149-160. PubMed ID: 26679736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On Graphically Checking Goodness-of-fit of Binary Logistic Regression Models.
    Gillmann G; Minder CE
    Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 19387509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis.
    Hedges LV; Pigott TD
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Dec; 9(4):426-45. PubMed ID: 15598097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A goodness-of-fit test for the random-effects distribution in mixed models.
    Efendi A; Drikvandi R; Verbeke G; Molenberghs G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):970-983. PubMed ID: 25539840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing Bayesian spatial models: Goodness-of-smoothing criteria for assessing under- and over-smoothing.
    Duncan EW; Mengersen KL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233019. PubMed ID: 32433653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Goodness-of-fit tests for correlated paired binary data.
    Tang ML; Pei YB; Wong WK; Li JL
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Aug; 21(4):331-45. PubMed ID: 20810456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of hypertabastic survival model with other unimodal hazard rate functions using a goodness-of-fit test.
    Tahir MR; Tran QX; Nikulin MS
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1936-1945. PubMed ID: 28173610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Goodness-of-fit test for monotone proportional subdistribution hazards assumptions based on weighted residuals.
    Boher JM; Filleron T; Giorgi R; Kramar A; Cook RJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):362-377. PubMed ID: 27790725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the validity of a statistical distribution: some illustrative examples from dermatological research.
    Sürücü B; Koç E
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2008 May; 33(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 18093239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Goodness-of-fit tests for the additive risk model with (p > 2)-dimensional time-invariant covariates.
    Kim J; Song MS; Lee S
    Lifetime Data Anal; 1998; 4(4):405-15. PubMed ID: 9880997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the Normality Assumption in Meta-Analyses.
    Wang CC; Lee WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 189(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 31781756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A closer look at the effect of preliminary goodness-of-fit testing for normality for the one-sample t-test.
    Rochon J; Kieser M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):410-26. PubMed ID: 21973094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of survival extrapolation in immuno-oncology using multiple pre-planned data cuts: learnings to aid in model selection.
    Bullement A; Willis A; Amin A; Schlichting M; Hatswell AJ; Bharmal M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):103. PubMed ID: 32375680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Bayesian nonparametric meta-analysis model.
    Karabatsos G; Talbott E; Walker SG
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 26035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.