369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26593244)
1. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical transportation in curved root canals instrumented by reciprocating file systems.
Barbieri N; Leonardi DP; Baechtold MS; Correr GM; Gabardo MC; Zielak JC; Baratto-Filho F
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Nov; 15():149. PubMed ID: 26593244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Gergi R; Arbab-Chirani R; Osta N; Naaman A
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1223-7. PubMed ID: 25069937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Influence of Cervical Preflaring on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris after Root Canal Preparation Using Different Instrumentation Systems.
Borges ÁH; Pereira TM; Porto AN; de Araújo Estrela CR; Miranda Pedro FL; Aranha AM; Guedes OA
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 26614016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shaping ability of the conventional nickel-titanium and reciprocating nickel-titanium file systems: a comparative study using micro-computed tomography.
Hwang YH; Bae KS; Baek SH; Kum KY; Lee W; Shon WJ; Chang SW
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1186-9. PubMed ID: 25069930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of reciprocating instruments for removing filling material in curved canals obturated with a single-cone technique: a micro-computed tomographic analysis.
Fruchi Lde C; Ordinola-Zapata R; Cavenago BC; Hungaro Duarte MA; Bueno CE; De Martin AS
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1000-4. PubMed ID: 24935552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination in maxillary lateral incisors.
Ibelli GS; Barroso JM; Capelli A; Spanó JC; Pécora JD
Braz Dent J; 2007; 18(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 17982547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of CM-Wire, M-Wire, and Nickel-Titanium Instruments for Removing Filling Material from Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.
Rodrigues CT; Duarte MA; de Almeida MM; de Andrade FB; Bernardineli N
J Endod; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1651-1655. PubMed ID: 27651042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 24673737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apical enlargement according to different pecking times at working length using reciprocating files.
Jeon HJ; Paranjpe A; Ha JH; Kim E; Lee W; Kim HC
J Endod; 2014 Feb; 40(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 24461419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Root Canal Surface Strain and Canal Center Transportation Induced by 3 Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instrument Systems.
Liu W; Wu B
J Endod; 2016 Feb; 42(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 26686822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals.
Wu H; Peng C; Bai Y; Hu X; Wang L; Li C
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25886847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in maxillary molars: SEM analysis.
Vanni JR; Santos R; Limongi O; Guerisoli DM; Capelli A; Pécora JD
Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 16429181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of canal length and curvature on working length alteration with WaveOne reciprocating files.
Berutti E; Chiandussi G; Paolino DS; Scotti N; Cantatore G; Castellucci A; Pasqualini D
J Endod; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1687-90. PubMed ID: 22099906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems.
Marzouk AM; Ghoneim AG
J Endod; 2013 Jul; 39(7):906-9. PubMed ID: 23791261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
