BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26593333)

  • 1. Single-coil and dual-coil defibrillator leads and association with clinical outcomes in a complete Danish nationwide ICD cohort.
    Larsen JM; Hjortshøj SP; Nielsen JC; Johansen JB; Petersen HH; Haarbo J; Johansen MB; Thøgersen AM
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Mar; 13(3):706-12. PubMed ID: 26593333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contemporary rates and outcomes of single- vs. dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead implantation: data from the Israeli ICD Registry.
    Leshem E; Suleiman M; Laish-Farkash A; Konstantino Y; Glikson M; Barsheshet A; Goldenberg I; Michowitz Y;
    Europace; 2017 Sep; 19(9):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 27702848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilization trends and clinical outcomes in patients implanted with a single- vs a dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: Insights from the ALTITUDE Study.
    Hsu JC; Saxon LA; Jones PW; Wehrenberg S; Marcus GM
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Aug; 12(8):1770-5. PubMed ID: 25916569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes with single-coil versus dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a meta-analysis.
    Sunderland N; Kaura A; Murgatroyd F; Dhillon P; Scott PA
    Europace; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e21-e29. PubMed ID: 28339860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of single- vs dual-coil implantable defibrillator leads: An observational analysis from the SIMPLE study.
    Neuzner J; Hohnloser SH; Kutyifa V; Glikson M; Dietze T; Mabo P; Vinolas X; Kautzner J; O'Hara G; Lawo T; Brachmann J; VanErven L; Gadler F; Appl U; Wang J; Connolly SJ; Healey JS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jul; 30(7):1078-1085. PubMed ID: 30945798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical impact, safety, and efficacy of single- versus dual-coil ICD leads in MADIT-CRT.
    Kutyifa V; Huth Ruwald AC; Aktas MK; Jons C; McNitt S; Polonsky B; Geller L; Merkely B; Moss AJ; Zareba W; Bloch Thomsen PE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1246-52. PubMed ID: 23889863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No benefit of a dual coil over a single coil ICD lead: evidence from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial.
    Aoukar PS; Poole JE; Johnson GW; Anderson J; Hellkamp AS; Mark DB; Lee KL; Bardy GH
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Jul; 10(7):970-6. PubMed ID: 23562699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multicentre comparison Of shock efficacy using single-vs. Dual-coil lead systems and Anodal vs. cathodaL polarITY defibrillation in patients undergoing transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The MODALITY study.
    Baccillieri MS; Gasparini G; Benacchio L; Zorzi A; Marras E; Zerbo F; Tomasi L; Vaccari D; Pastore G; Bonanno C; Molon G; Zanotto G; Fusco A; Carasi M; Zorzi A; Calzolari V; Ignatiuk B; Cannas S; Vaglio A; Al Bunni M; Pedrini A; Olivieri A; Rampazzo R; Minicuci N; Corrado D; Verlato R
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 43(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 25690336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should Single-Coil Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads Be Used in all Patients?
    Almehmadi F; Manlucu J
    Card Electrophysiol Clin; 2018 Mar; 10(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 29428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Single-Coil and Dual-Coil Implantable Defibrillators: A Meta-Analysis.
    Kumar P; Baker M; Gehi AK
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Jan; 3(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 29759689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Apical versus Non-Apical Lead: Is ICD Lead Position Important for Successful Defibrillation?
    Amit G; Wang J; Connolly SJ; Glikson M; Hohnloser S; Wright DJ; Brachmann J; Defaye P; Neuzner J; Mabo P; Vanerven L; Vinolas X; O'Hara G; Kautzner J; Appl U; Gadler F; Stein K; Konstantino Y; Healey JS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 May; 27(5):581-6. PubMed ID: 26888558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single and dual coil shock efficacy and predictors of shock failure in patients with modern implantable cardioverter defibrillators-a single-center paired randomized study.
    Larsen JM; Heath FP; Riahi S; Holm K; Johansen MB; Hjortshøj SP; Thøgersen AM
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 30229405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shock efficacy of single and dual coil electrodes-new insights from the NORDIC ICD Trial.
    Bänsch D; Bonnemeier H; Brandt J; Bode F; Svendsen JH; Ritter O; Aring J; Gutleben KJ; Schneider R; Felk A; Hauser T; Buchholz A; Hindricks G; Wegscheider K
    Europace; 2018 Jun; 20(6):971-978. PubMed ID: 28419217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with single- or dual-coil defibrillation leads and active can.
    Lubiński A; Lewicka-Nowak E; Zienciuk A; Królak T; Kempa M; Pazdyga A; Raczak G; Swiatecka G
    Kardiol Pol; 2005 Sep; 63(3):234-41; discussion 242-3. PubMed ID: 16180177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term performance and lead failure analysis of the Durata defibrillation lead compared to its previous model, the recalled Riata defibrillation lead.
    Kleemann T; Nonnenmacher F; Strauss M; Kouraki K; Werner N; Fendt A; Zahn R
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2012-2019. PubMed ID: 31332876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Failure rates of single- versus dual-coil nonrecalled sprint quattro defibrillator leads.
    Shariff N; Alluri K; Saba S
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Jan; 115(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 25465935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in paediatric practice: a single-centre UK experience with focus on subcutaneous defibrillation.
    Griksaitis MJ; Rosengarten JA; Gnanapragasam JP; Haw MP; Morgan JM
    Europace; 2013 Apr; 15(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 23333943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal Trends in and Factors Associated With Use of Single- Versus Dual-Coil Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads: Data From the NCDR ICD Registry.
    Pokorney SD; Parzynski CS; Daubert JP; Hegland DD; Varosy PD; Curtis JP; Al-Khatib SM
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Jun; 3(6):612-619. PubMed ID: 29759435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laser lead extraction allows for safe and effective removal of single- and dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: A single-centre experience over 12 years.
    Pecha S; Yildirim Y; Gosau N; Aydin MA; Willems S; Treede H; Reichenspurner H; Hakmi S
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 27624353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator compared to dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator: less is more! Data from the German Device Registry.
    Bogossian H; Frommeyer G; Hochadel M; Ince H; Spitzer SG; Eckardt L; Maier SKG; Kleemann T; Brachmann J; Stellbrink C; Gonska BD; Kääb S; Senges J; Lemke B
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2020 Jul; 109(7):911-917. PubMed ID: 31823040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.