181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26594096)
1. Comparison of oil removal in surfactant alternating gas with water alternating gas, water flooding and gas flooding in secondary oil recovery process.
Salehi MM; Safarzadeh MA; Sahraei E; Nejad SA
J Pet Sci Eng; 2014 Aug; 120():86-93. PubMed ID: 26594096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimized polymer enhanced foam flooding for ordinary heavy oil reservoir after cross-linked polymer flooding.
Sun C; Hou J; Pan G; Xia Z
J Pet Explor Prod Technol; 2016; 6(4):777-785. PubMed ID: 27818857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of Chemical-Foam Design as a Novel Approach toward Immiscible Foam Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery.
Hosseini-Nasab SM; Zitha PLJ
Energy Fuels; 2017 Oct; 31(10):10525-10534. PubMed ID: 29093612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental study on electromagnetic-assisted ZnO nanofluid flooding for enhanced oil recovery (EOR).
Adil M; Lee K; Mohd Zaid H; Ahmad Latiff NR; Alnarabiji MS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193518. PubMed ID: 29489897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Insights into the Effects of Pore Size Distribution on the Flowing Behavior of Carbonate Rocks: Linking a Nano-Based Enhanced Oil Recovery Method to Rock Typing.
Rezaei A; Abdollahi H; Derikvand Z; Hemmati-Sarapardeh A; Mosavi A; Nabipour N
Nanomaterials (Basel); 2020 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 32443641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A micromodel analysis of factors influencing NAPL removal by surfactant foam flooding.
Jeong SW; Corapcioglu MY
J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Jan; 60(1-2):77-96. PubMed ID: 12498575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining Thermal Effect and Mobility Control Mechanism to Reduce Water Cut in a Sandstone Reservoir in Kazakhstan.
Sagandykova D; Shakeel M; Pourafshary P
Polymers (Basel); 2024 Jun; 16(12):. PubMed ID: 38932001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Insights into Molecular Dynamics and Oil Extraction Behavior of the Polymeric Surfactant in a Multilayered Heterogeneous Reservoir.
Zheng H; Liu H; Tong K
ACS Omega; 2024 Mar; 9(10):11243-11254. PubMed ID: 38496924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Model study of enhanced oil recovery by flooding with aqueous surfactant solution and comparison with theory.
Fletcher PD; Savory LD; Woods F; Clarke A; Howe AM
Langmuir; 2015 Mar; 31(10):3076-85. PubMed ID: 25749192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Foam flow in a model porous medium: II. The effect of trapped gas.
Jones SA; Getrouw N; Vincent-Bonnieu S
Soft Matter; 2018 May; 14(18):3497-3503. PubMed ID: 29707727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A pore scale investigation of crude oil distribution and removal from homogeneous porous media during surfactant-induced remediation.
Ghosh J; Tick GR
J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Dec; 155():20-30. PubMed ID: 24113292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental Study on Enhanced Oil Recovery Method in Tahe High-Temperature and High-Salinity Channel Sand Reservoir: Combination of Profile Control and Chemical Flooding.
Jin FY; Li QH; He Y; Luo Q; Pu WF
ACS Omega; 2020 Mar; 5(11):5657-5665. PubMed ID: 32226842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound-assisted CO
Hamidi H; Sharifi Haddad A; Mohammadian E; Rafati R; Azdarpour A; Ghahri P; Ombewa P; Neuert T; Zink A
Ultrason Sonochem; 2017 Mar; 35(Pt A):243-250. PubMed ID: 27720591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polymers for enhanced oil recovery: fundamentals and selection criteria.
Rellegadla S; Prajapat G; Agrawal A
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Jun; 101(11):4387-4402. PubMed ID: 28502065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time-Dependent Physicochemical Changes of Carbonate Surfaces from SmartWater (Diluted Seawater) Flooding Processes for Improved Oil Recovery.
Chen SY; Kristiansen K; Seo D; Cadirov NA; Dobbs HA; Kaufman Y; Schrader AM; Andresen Eguiluz RC; Alotaibi MB; Ayirala SC; Boles JR; Yousef AA; Israelachvili JN
Langmuir; 2019 Jan; 35(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 30509072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laboratory Testing in Support of Surfactant-Alternating-Gas Foam Flood for NAPL Recovery from Shallow Subsurface.
Stylianou M; Lee JH; Kostarelos K; Voskaridou T
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 101(6):744-750. PubMed ID: 30255234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surfactant-Polymer Flooding: Influence of the Injection Scheme.
Druetta P; Picchioni F
Energy Fuels; 2018 Dec; 32(12):12231-12246. PubMed ID: 30774190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A pore-scale investigation of heavy crude oil trapping and removal during surfactant-enhanced remediation.
Ghosh J; Tick GR; Akyol NH; Zhang Y
J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Jun; 223():103471. PubMed ID: 31014903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of NMR imaging to steam foam flooding in porous media.
Quan C; Weimin W; Xianchun C
Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 14(7-8):949-50. PubMed ID: 8970119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Surfactant Flooding Driven Oil-Detachment in Nano-Silica Channels.
Tang X; Xiao S; Lei Q; Yuan L; Peng B; He L; Luo J; Pei Y
J Phys Chem B; 2019 Jan; 123(1):277-288. PubMed ID: 30589550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
