These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26594883)

  • 1. Distractor-relevance determines whether task-switching enhances or impairs distractor memory.
    Chiu YC; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26594883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of alpha oscillations in distractor inhibition during memory retention.
    Schroeder SCY; Ball F; Busch NA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 48(7):2516-2526. PubMed ID: 29381823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The search for oculomotor inhibition: interactions with working memory.
    Van der Stigchel S
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(6):429-35. PubMed ID: 20178939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task-irrelevant distractors in the delay period interfere selectively with visual short-term memory for spatial locations.
    Marini F; Scott J; Aron AR; Ester EF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1384-1392. PubMed ID: 28439791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3251-3260. PubMed ID: 28765992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A salient and task-irrelevant collinear structure hurts visual search.
    Tseng CH; Jingling L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124190. PubMed ID: 25909986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decomposing the n-back task: An individual differences study using the reference-back paradigm.
    Rac-Lubashevsky R; Kessler Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():190-9. PubMed ID: 27425422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
    SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction.
    Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of working memory in auditory selective attention.
    Dalton P; Santangelo V; Spence C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2126-32. PubMed ID: 19557667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task Switching Hurts Memory Encoding.
    Muhmenthaler MC; Meier B
    Exp Psychol; 2019 Jan; 66(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 30777509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory.
    Hakim N; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Awh E; Vogel EK
    Cereb Cortex; 2021 Jun; 31(7):3323-3337. PubMed ID: 33675357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of task switching and emotional stimuli on memory selectivity.
    Dubravac M; Garrison KE; Schmeichel BJ
    Cogn Emot; 2024 Jun; 38(4):480-491. PubMed ID: 38179666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain systems underlying attentional control and emotional distraction during working memory encoding.
    Ziaei M; Peira N; Persson J
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():276-86. PubMed ID: 24185015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disruption of short-term memory by distractor speech: does content matter?
    Bell R; Mund I; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):146-68. PubMed ID: 20544562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accessory stimuli speed reaction times and reduce distraction in a target-distractor task.
    Tudge L; Schubert T
    J Vis; 2016 May; 16(7):11. PubMed ID: 27183193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the spatial interaction of visual working memory and attention: evidence for a global effect from memory-guided saccades.
    Herwig A; Beisert M; Schneider WX
    J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):8. PubMed ID: 20616119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impaired set-shifting and dissociable effects on tests of spatial working memory following the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride in human volunteers.
    Mehta MA; Manes FF; Magnolfi G; Sahakian BJ; Robbins TW
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Nov; 176(3-4):331-42. PubMed ID: 15114435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.