187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26594967)
1. Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle.
Peacock ZS; Tricomi BJ; Faquin WC; Magill JC; Murphy BA; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 26(8):2320-4. PubMed ID: 26594967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis.
Peacock ZS; Tricomi BJ; Lawler ME; Faquin WC; Magill JC; Murphy BA; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 72(9):1773-87. PubMed ID: 24602810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microscopic changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible.
Thurmüller P; Troulis MJ; Rosenberg A; Chuang SK; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):249-58. PubMed ID: 16413897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histomorphometric analysis of the porcine mandibular distraction wound.
Lawler ME; Tayebaty FT; Williams WB; Troulis MJ; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1543-54. PubMed ID: 20561467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone.
Glowacki J; Shusterman EM; Troulis M; Holmes R; Perrott D; Kaban LB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Feb; 113(2):566-73. PubMed ID: 14758219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated continuous distraction osteogenesis may allow faster distraction rates: a preliminary study.
Peacock ZS; Tricomi BJ; Murphy BA; Magill JC; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1073-84. PubMed ID: 23499159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible.
Thurmüller P; Troulis MJ; Rosenberg A; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Nov; 60(11):1327-33. PubMed ID: 12420269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Serial histologic and immunohistochemical changes in anterior digastric myocytes in response to distraction osteogenesis.
Lawler ME; Hansen GM; Williams WB; Susarla SM; Faquin WC; Troulis MJ; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):168-78. PubMed ID: 21549468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: part III. Gradual distraction versus acute lengthening.
Warren SM; Mehrara BJ; Steinbrech DS; Paccione MF; Greenwald JA; Spector JA; Longaker MT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Feb; 107(2):441-53. PubMed ID: 11214060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible with a modified intraoral appliance: a pilot study in miniature pigs.
Holzhauer DP; Larsen PE; Miloro M; Vig KW
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 9835823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correction of rabbit model with mandibular ramus shortening by distraction osteogenesis at condylar neck.
Meng Q; Yang X; Long X; Li J; Cai H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):931-40. PubMed ID: 21764198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of latency period in a rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Aida T; Yoshioka I; Tominaga K; Fukuda J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 32(1):54-62; discussion 63. PubMed ID: 12653234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of latency in mandibular osteodistraction.
Tavakoli K; Walsh WR; Bonar F; Smart R; Wulf S; Poole MD
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1998 Aug; 26(4):209-19. PubMed ID: 9777499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of latency on the quality and quantity of bone produced by dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis.
Moore C; Campbell PM; Dechow PC; Ellis ML; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 21967933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minipig model of maxillary distraction osteogenesis: immunohistochemical and histomorphometric analysis of the sequence of osteogenesis.
Papadaki ME; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 70(11):2629-40. PubMed ID: 22516839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Dental assisted distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Results of an animal experimental study and initial clinical application].
Braumann B; Niederhagen B; Schmolke C; von Lindern JJ
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1999 Jan; 3(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 10077960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model.
Troulis MJ; Glowacki J; Perrott DH; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 May; 58(5):507-13; discussion 514. PubMed ID: 10800906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in parathyroid hormone-related protein and 3-dimensional trabecular bone structure of the mandibular condyle following mandibular distraction osteogenesis in growing rats.
Shibazaki R; Maki K; Tachikawa T; Shibasaki Y; Hinton RJ; Carlson DS; Opperman LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 63(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 15789323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histology of the porcine mandibular distraction wound.
Zimmermann CE; Thurmüller P; Troulis MJ; Perrott DH; Rahn B; Kaban LB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jun; 34(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 16053852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: latency, rate, and rhythm determine the adaptive response.
Paccione MF; Mehrara BJ; Warren SM; Greenwald JA; Spector JA; Luchs JS; Longaker MT
J Craniofac Surg; 2001 Mar; 12(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 11314629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
