These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26595065)

  • 1. How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory.
    Weisberg SM; Newcombe NS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 May; 42(5):768-785. PubMed ID: 26595065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Charting the development of cognitive mapping.
    Nazareth A; Weisberg SM; Margulis K; Newcombe NS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Jun; 170():86-106. PubMed ID: 29453130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wormholes in virtual space: From cognitive maps to cognitive graphs.
    Warren WH; Rothman DB; Schnapp BH; Ericson JD
    Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():152-163. PubMed ID: 28577445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in cognitive map accuracy: Investigating the role of landmark familiarity.
    Youngson NL; Vollebregt M; Sutton JE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Mar; 73(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 30883177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Instructions matter: Individual differences in navigation strategy and ability.
    Boone AP; Maghen B; Hegarty M
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1401-1414. PubMed ID: 31102190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive correlates of spatial navigation: Associations between executive functioning and the virtual Morris Water Task.
    Korthauer LE; Nowak NT; Frahmand M; Driscoll I
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 317():470-478. PubMed ID: 27720743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.
    Weisberg SM; Schinazi VR; Newcombe NS; Shipley TF; Epstein RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):669-682. PubMed ID: 24364725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial mental representations: the influence of age on route learning from maps and navigation.
    Muffato V; Meneghetti C; De Beni R
    Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1836-1850. PubMed ID: 29846784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct current brain stimulation enhances navigation efficiency in individuals with low spatial sense of direction.
    Brunyé TT; Holmes A; Cantelon J; Eddy MD; Gardony AL; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA
    Neuroreport; 2014 Oct; 25(15):1175-9. PubMed ID: 25144391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in the allocation of visual attention during navigation.
    Keller M; Sutton JE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Mar; 76(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 33764100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.
    Kraemer DJ; Schinazi VR; Cawkwell PB; Tekriwal A; Epstein RA; Thompson-Schill SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 27668486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impairments in precision, rather than spatial strategy, characterize performance on the virtual Morris Water Maze: A case study.
    Kolarik BS; Shahlaie K; Hassan A; Borders AA; Kaufman KC; Gurkoff G; Yonelinas AP; Ekstrom AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jan; 80():90-101. PubMed ID: 26593960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Map learning and working memory: Multimodal learning strategies.
    Knight MJ; Tlauka M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1405-1418. PubMed ID: 28471296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of age in women in visuo-spatial memory in reaching and navigation tasks with and without landmarks.
    Perrochon A; Mandigout S; Petruzzellis S; Soria Garcia N; Zaoui M; Berthoz A; Daviet JC
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Sep; 684():13-17. PubMed ID: 29966753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.
    Keil J; Edler D; Kuchinke L; Dickmann F
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229575. PubMed ID: 32119712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hex Maze: A new virtual maze able to track acquisition and usage of three navigation strategies.
    Spriggs MJ; Kirk IJ; Skelton RW
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 339():195-206. PubMed ID: 29203335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A slippery directional slope: Individual differences in using slope as a directional cue.
    Weisberg SM; Newcombe NS
    Mem Cognit; 2014 May; 42(4):648-61. PubMed ID: 24338529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wakeful rest promotes the integration of spatial memories into accurate cognitive maps.
    Craig M; Dewar M; Harris MA; Della Sala S; Wolbers T
    Hippocampus; 2016 Feb; 26(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 26235141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of navigational working memory: evidence from 6- to 10-year-old children.
    Piccardi L; Leonzi M; D'Amico S; Marano A; Guariglia C
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2014 Jun; 32(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 24588844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Representation of impossible worlds in the cognitive map.
    Kluss T; Marsh WE; Zetzsche C; Schill K
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():271-6. PubMed ID: 26239752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.