159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26595066)
21. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
Clarke AJ; Butler LT
Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The contribution of encoding and retrieval processes to proactive interference.
Kliegl O; Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1778-89. PubMed ID: 25603166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.
Vitkovitch M; Cooper E
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1229-40. PubMed ID: 22390174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Erroneous and veridical recall are not two sides of the same coin: Evidence from semantic distraction in free recall.
Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Sörqvist P; Beaman CP; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1728-40. PubMed ID: 25938326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Novel word integration in the mental lexicon: evidence from unmasked and masked semantic priming.
Tamminen J; Gaskell MG
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):1001-25. PubMed ID: 23035665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A joint investigation of semantic facilitation and semantic interference in continuous naming.
Scaltritti M; Peressotti F; Navarrete E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):818-823. PubMed ID: 27929326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adaptive memory: determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing.
Burns DJ; Burns SA; Hwang AJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):206-18. PubMed ID: 21244114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visual repetition priming for words relies on access to the visual input lexicon: evidence from a dyslexic patient.
Carlesimo GA; Fadda L; Sabbadini M; Caltagirone C
Neuropsychologia; 1994 Sep; 32(9):1089-100. PubMed ID: 7991076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
Pierce BH; Gallo DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. On the robustness of prime response retrieval processes: evidence from auditory negative priming without probe interference.
Mayr S; Buchner A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):335-57. PubMed ID: 23799324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
Kinoshita S; Mills L; Norris D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of test expectancy in the build-up of proactive interference in long-term memory.
Weinstein Y; Gilmore AW; Szpunar KK; McDermott KB
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1039-48. PubMed ID: 24707786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Are lexical factors immune to response modality in backward recall? The effects of imageability and word frequency.
Beaudry O; Saint-Aubin J; Guérard K; Pâquet M
Can J Exp Psychol; 2018 Jun; 72(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28333479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Distraction control processes in free recall: benefits and costs to performance.
Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hodgetts HM; Beaman CP; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):118-33. PubMed ID: 25329080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Individual differences in working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.
Rose NS
Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Dec; 67(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 24341741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Semantic and repetition priming within the attentional blink: an event-related brain potential (ERP) investigation study.
Pesciarelli F; Kutas M; Dell'acqua R; Peressotti F; Job R; Urbach TP
Biol Psychol; 2007 Sep; 76(1-2):21-30. PubMed ID: 17611011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Remembering episodic memories is not necessary for forgetting of negative words: Semantic retrieval can cause forgetting of negative words.
Kobayashi M; Tanno Y
Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):766-71. PubMed ID: 25199466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Auditory distraction eliminates retrieval induced forgetting: implications for the processing of unattended sound.
Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Beaman CP; Jones DM
Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(5):368-75. PubMed ID: 23681014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Covert operations: orthographic recoding as a basis for repetition priming in word identification.
Masson ME; MacLeod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):858-71. PubMed ID: 12219795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A causal contiguity effect that persists across time scales.
Kiliç A; Criss AH; Howard MW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):297-303. PubMed ID: 22582969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
