These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26595068)

  • 21. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 30859406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
    McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments.
    Frank DJ; Kuhlmann BG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 27709983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do older adults show less confidence in their monitoring of learning?
    Serra MJ; Dunlosky J; Hertzog C
    Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 18726751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How Much Do Metamemory Beliefs Contribute to the Font-Size Effect in Judgments of Learning?
    Hu X; Li T; Zheng J; Su N; Liu Z; Luo L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142351. PubMed ID: 26556478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enhanced metamemory at delays: why do judgments of learning improve over time?
    Kelemen WL; Weaver CA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Nov; 23(6):1394-409. PubMed ID: 9372607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Multiple Cues In Addition to Memory for Past Test Accuracy.
    Hertzog C; Hines JC; Touron DR
    Arch Sci Psychol; 2013; 1(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 25914865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):647-58. PubMed ID: 25388520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 21999219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 18605499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Isolating the contribution of perceptual fluency to judgments of learning (JOLs): Evidence for reactivity in measuring the influence of fluency.
    Fiacconi CM; Mitton EE; Laursen SJ; Skinner J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):926-944. PubMed ID: 31556640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
    Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments.
    McCabe DP; Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):389-402. PubMed ID: 21264598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM).
    Nelson TO; Narens L; Dunlosky J
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 15053719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory.
    Kimball DR; Metcalfe J
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):918-29. PubMed ID: 14651299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of making judgments of learning on memory performance: Positive, negative, or both?
    Janes JL; Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 29611141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.