These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26595281)

  • 21. A TMS study on the contribution of visual area V5 to the perception of implied motion in art and its appreciation.
    Cattaneo Z; Schiavi S; Silvanto J; Nadal M
    Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 8(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 26429631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Artistic forms and complexity.
    Boon JP; Casti J; Taylor RP
    Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2011 Apr; 15(2):265-83. PubMed ID: 21382264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Gaze differences in processing pictures with emotional content.
    Budimir S; Palmović M
    Coll Antropol; 2011 Jan; 35 Suppl 1():17-23. PubMed ID: 21648306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Viewing artworks: contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience.
    Cupchik GC; Vartanian O; Crawley A; Mikulis DJ
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Jun; 70(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 19223099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implicit emotion regulation in the context of viewing artworks: ERP evidence in response to pleasant and unpleasant pictures.
    Van Dongen NN; Van Strien JW; Dijkstra K
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Aug; 107():48-54. PubMed ID: 27367861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual Complexity and Affect: Ratings Reflect More Than Meets the Eye.
    Madan CR; Bayer J; Gamer M; Lonsdorf TB; Sommer T
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2368. PubMed ID: 29403412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Time course of visual perception: coarse-to-fine processing and beyond.
    Hegdé J
    Prog Neurobiol; 2008 Apr; 84(4):405-39. PubMed ID: 17976895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings.
    Leder H; Carbon CC; Ripsas AL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):176-98. PubMed ID: 16289075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Covert painting simulations influence aesthetic appreciation of artworks.
    Leder H; Bär S; Topolinski S
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Dec; 23(12):1479-81. PubMed ID: 23137968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Matching reality in the arts: self-referential neural processing of naturalistic compared to surrealistic images.
    Silveira S; Graupmann V; Frey D; Blautzik J; Meindl T; Reiser M; Chen C; Wang Y; Bao Y; PöppeI E; Gutyrchik E
    Perception; 2012; 41(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 23025160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Translations: effects of viewpoint, feature, and naming on identifying repeatedly copied drawings.
    Dyson BJ; Cohen R
    Perception; 2010; 39(2):157-72. PubMed ID: 20402239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of presentation format and viewer training in the visual arts on the perception of pictorial and aesthetic qualities of paintings.
    Locher PJ; Smith JK; Smith LF
    Perception; 2001; 30(4):449-65. PubMed ID: 11383192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An empirical investigation of the visual rightness theory of picture perception.
    Locher PJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Oct; 114(2):147-64. PubMed ID: 14529822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of varying presentation time on long-term recognition memory for scenes: Verbatim and gist representations.
    Ahmad FN; Moscovitch M; Hockley WE
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):390-403. PubMed ID: 27858379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Positive erotic picture stimuli for emotion research in heterosexual females.
    Jacob GA; Arntz A; Domes G; Reiss N; Siep N
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Dec; 190(2-3):348-51. PubMed ID: 21696831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Global Image Properties Predict Ratings of Affective Pictures.
    Redies C; Grebenkina M; Mohseni M; Kaduhm A; Dobel C
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():953. PubMed ID: 32477228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Line spacing in Mondrian paintings and computer-generated modifications.
    Wolach AH; McHale MA
    J Gen Psychol; 2005 Jul; 132(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 16011076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Eye gaze behavior during affective picture viewing: Effects of motivational significance, gender, age, and repeated exposure.
    Gomez P; von Gunten A; Danuser B
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Sep; 146():107713. PubMed ID: 31173808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Portuguese Norms of Name Agreement, Concept Familiarity, Subjective Frequency and Visual Complexity for 150 Colored and Tridimensional Pictures.
    Soares AP; Pureza R; Comesaña M
    Span J Psychol; 2018 Apr; 21():E8. PubMed ID: 29633684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Functional neuroanatomy of the perception of modern art: A DC-EEG study on the influence of stylistic information on aesthetic experience.
    Lengger PG; Fischmeister FP; Leder H; Bauer H
    Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1158():93-102. PubMed ID: 17559816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.