289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26595561)
1. Association of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Morcellation Warning With Rates of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.
Barron KI; Richard T; Robinson PS; Lamvu G
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 126(6):1174-1180. PubMed ID: 26595561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.
Harris JA; Swenson CW; Uppal S; Kamdar N; Mahnert N; As-Sanie S; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):98.e1-98.e13. PubMed ID: 26314519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Practice Patterns and Complications of Benign Hysterectomy Following the FDA Statement Warning Against the Use of Power Morcellation.
Multinu F; Casarin J; Hanson KT; Angioni S; Mariani A; Habermann EB; Laughlin-Tommaso SK
JAMA Surg; 2018 Jun; 153(6):e180141. PubMed ID: 29641835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Change in Surgical Practice for Women With Leiomyomas After the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Morcellator Safety Communication.
Clark NM; Schembri M; Jacoby VL
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):1057-1063. PubMed ID: 29016511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of the 2014 Food and Drug Administration Warnings Against Power Morcellation.
Lum DA; Sokol ER; Berek JS; Schulkin J; Chen L; McElwain CA; Wright JD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):548-56. PubMed ID: 26827905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in Mode of Hysterectomy After the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Power Morcellation Advisory.
Ottarsdottir H; Cohen SL; Cox M; Vitonis A; Einarsson JI
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 129(6):1014-1021. PubMed ID: 28486371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in Myomectomy Practice After the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Safety Communication on Power Morcellation.
Stentz NC; Cooney LG; Sammel M; Shah DK
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 129(6):1007-1013. PubMed ID: 28486366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal trends in minimally invasive myomectomy before and after the US Food and Drug Administration recommendation against electric morcellation.
Pereira N; Frankel WC; Hutchinson AP; Patel HH; Mostisser C; Elias RT
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 137(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 28218964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Racial Disparities in Response to a US Food and Drug Administration Safety Communication Regarding the Use of Power Morcellation for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyoma.
Matsushita T; Sekizawa A; Jacobs LK
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):178-185.e1. PubMed ID: 30936031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minilaparotomy Versus Laparoscopic Myomectomy After Cessation of Power Morcellation: Rate of Wound Complications.
Dubin AK; Wei J; Sullivan S; Udaltsova N; Zaritsky E; Yamamoto MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):946-953. PubMed ID: 28552622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Morcellation Techniques at the Time of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.
Meurs EAIM; Brito LG; Ajao MO; Goggins ER; Vitonis AF; Einarsson JI; Cohen SL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):843-849. PubMed ID: 28483536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the Future of Open Intraperitoneal Power-Morcellation of Fibroids?
Parker WH; Pritts EA; Olive DL
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 59(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 26670834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysterectomy Practice Patterns in the Postmorcellation Era.
Jorgensen EM; Modest AM; Hur HC; Hacker MR; Awtrey CS
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):643-649. PubMed ID: 30870280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Route, Resource Use, and Outcomes: Change After Power Morcellation Warning.
Desai VB; Wright JD; Lin H; Gross CP; Sallah YH; Schwartz PE; Xu X
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):227-238. PubMed ID: 31348209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids Within a Containment System and Without Power Morcellation.
Kho KA; Brown DN
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 59(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 26670832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic myomectomy and morcellation: A review of techniques, outcomes, and practice guidelines.
Glaser LM; Friedman J; Tsai S; Chaudhari A; Milad M
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Jan; 46():99-112. PubMed ID: 29078975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A medical-legal review of power morcellation in the face of the recent FDA warning and litigation.
Ton R; Kilic GS; Phelps JY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(4):564-72. PubMed ID: 25623369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Power Morcellation Trends in a West Coast Integrated Health System.
Zaritsky E; Tucker LY; Neugebauer R; Chou T; Flanagan T; Walter AJ; Raine-Bennett T
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 129(6):996-1005. PubMed ID: 28486359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contained tissue extraction using power morcellation: prospective evaluation of leakage parameters.
Cohen SL; Morris SN; Brown DN; Greenberg JA; Walsh BW; Gargiulo AR; Isaacson KB; Wright KN; Srouji SS; Anchan RM; Vogell AB; Einarsson JI
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):257.e1-257.e6. PubMed ID: 26348384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electric morcellation-related reoperations after laparoscopic myomectomy and nonmyomectomy procedures.
Pereira N; Buchanan TR; Wishall KM; Kim SH; Grias I; Richard SD; Della Badia CR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 25218993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]