These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26596440)

  • 1. Iterative Optimization of Molecular Mechanics Force Fields from NMR Data of Full-Length Proteins.
    Li DW; Brüschweiler R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 Jun; 7(6):1773-82. PubMed ID: 26596440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations.
    Mackerell AD; Feig M; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Aug; 25(11):1400-15. PubMed ID: 15185334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protocol To Make Protein NMR Structures Amenable to Stable Long Time Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Li DW; Brüschweiler R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Apr; 10(4):1781-7. PubMed ID: 26580385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Maximum-Likelihood Approach to Force-Field Calibration.
    Zaborowski B; Jagieła D; Czaplewski C; Hałabis A; Lewandowska A; Żmudzińska W; Ołdziej S; Karczyńska A; Omieczynski C; Wirecki T; Liwo A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Sep; 55(9):2050-70. PubMed ID: 26263302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Biomolecules Using NMR Spin Relaxation as Benchmarks:  Application to the AMBER99SB Force Field.
    Showalter SA; Brüschweiler R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2007 May; 3(3):961-75. PubMed ID: 26627416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating amber force fields using computed NMR chemical shifts.
    Koes DR; Vries JK
    Proteins; 2017 Oct; 85(10):1944-1956. PubMed ID: 28688107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new force field (ECEPP-05) for peptides, proteins, and organic molecules.
    Arnautova YA; Jagielska A; Scheraga HA
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Mar; 110(10):5025-44. PubMed ID: 16526746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental verification of force fields for molecular dynamics simulations using Gly-Pro-Gly-Gly.
    Aliev AE; Courtier-Murias D
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Sep; 114(38):12358-75. PubMed ID: 20825228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB.
    Maier JA; Martinez C; Kasavajhala K; Wickstrom L; Hauser KE; Simmerling C
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Aug; 11(8):3696-713. PubMed ID: 26574453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New force field on modeling intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Wang W; Ye W; Jiang C; Luo R; Chen HF
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2014 Sep; 84(3):253-69. PubMed ID: 24589355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward a predictive understanding of slow methyl group dynamics in proteins.
    Long D; Li DW; Walter KF; Griesinger C; Brüschweiler R
    Biophys J; 2011 Aug; 101(4):910-5. PubMed ID: 21843482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.
    Hornak V; Abel R; Okur A; Strockbine B; Roitberg A; Simmerling C
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):712-25. PubMed ID: 16981200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The utility of residual dipolar couplings in detecting motion in carbohydrates: application to sucrose.
    Venable RM; Delaglio F; Norris SE; Freedberg DI
    Carbohydr Res; 2005 Apr; 340(5):863-74. PubMed ID: 15780252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a QM/MM force field and molecular mechanics force fields in simulations of alanine and glycine "dipeptides" (Ace-Ala-Nme and Ace-Gly-Nme) in water in relation to the problem of modeling the unfolded peptide backbone in solution.
    Hu H; Elstner M; Hermans J
    Proteins; 2003 Feb; 50(3):451-63. PubMed ID: 12557187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 3. The impact of force fields and ligand charge models.
    Xu L; Sun H; Li Y; Wang J; Hou T
    J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jul; 117(28):8408-21. PubMed ID: 23789789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are current semiempirical methods better than force fields? A study from the thermodynamics perspective.
    Seabra Gde M; Walker RC; Roitberg AE
    J Phys Chem A; 2009 Oct; 113(43):11938-48. PubMed ID: 19848431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the ability of molecular dynamics force fields to recapitulate NMR derived protein side chain order parameters.
    O'Brien ES; Wand AJ; Sharp KA
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1156-60. PubMed ID: 26990788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The intrinsic conformational features of amino acids from a protein coil library and their applications in force field development.
    Jiang F; Han W; Wu YD
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 Mar; 15(10):3413-28. PubMed ID: 23385383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Docking of protein-protein complexes on the basis of highly ambiguous intermolecular distance restraints derived from 1H/15N chemical shift mapping and backbone 15N-1H residual dipolar couplings using conjoined rigid body/torsion angle dynamics.
    Clore GM; Schwieters CD
    J Am Chem Soc; 2003 Mar; 125(10):2902-12. PubMed ID: 12617657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Refinement of the application of the GROMOS 54A7 force field to β-peptides.
    Lin Z; van Gunsteren WF
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Dec; 34(32):2796-805. PubMed ID: 24122968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.