BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26596524)

  • 1. Next-Generation Sequencing and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Have Comparable Performance Characteristics in the Analysis of Pancreaticobiliary Brushings for Malignancy.
    Dudley JC; Zheng Z; McDonald T; Le LP; Dias-Santagata D; Borger D; Batten J; Vernovsky K; Sweeney B; Arpin RN; Brugge WR; Forcione DG; Pitman MB; Iafrate AJ
    J Mol Diagn; 2016 Jan; 18(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 26596524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of KRAS mutation analysis and FISH for detecting pancreatobiliary tract cancer in cytology specimens collected during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Kipp BR; Fritcher EG; Clayton AC; Gores GJ; Roberts LR; Zhang J; Levy MJ; Halling KC
    J Mol Diagn; 2010 Nov; 12(6):780-6. PubMed ID: 20864634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cytomorphologic characteristics of next-generation sequencing-positive bile duct brushing specimens.
    Rosenbaum MW; Arpin R; Limbocker J; Casey B; Le L; Dudley J; Iafrate AJ; Pitman MB
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):520-527. PubMed ID: 32839152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
    Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tiny but mighty: use of next generation sequencing on discarded cytocentrifuged bile duct brushing specimens to increase sensitivity of cytological diagnosis.
    Harbhajanka A; Michael CW; Janaki N; Gokozan HN; Wasman J; Bomeisl P; Yoest J; Sadri N
    Mod Pathol; 2020 Oct; 33(10):2019-2025. PubMed ID: 32457409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
    Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of Ancillary Techniques in Biliary Cytopathology Specimens.
    Layfield L
    Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(1-2):175-181. PubMed ID: 31121596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies for improving diagnostic accuracy of biliary strictures.
    Salomao M; Gonda TA; Margolskee E; Eguia V; Remotti H; Poneros JM; Sethi A; Saqi A
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 123(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 25564796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FISHing for pancreatobiliary tract malignancy in endoscopic brushings enhances the sensitivity of routine cytology.
    Barr Fritcher EG; Kipp BR; Halling KC; Clayton AC
    Cytopathology; 2014 Oct; 25(5):288-301. PubMed ID: 25073411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Significance of atypia in pancreatic and bile duct brushings: follow-up analysis of the categories atypical and suspicious for malignancy.
    Chadwick BE; Layfield LJ; Witt BL; Schmidt RL; Cox RN; Adler DG
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 42(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24167030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative contribution of Ki-ras gene analysis and brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic diseases.
    Van Laethem JL; Bourgeois V; Parma J; Delhaye M; Cochaux P; Velu T; Devière J; Cremer M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Jun; 47(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 9647372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Optimized Set of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probes for Detection of Pancreatobiliary Tract Cancer in Cytology Brush Samples.
    Barr Fritcher EG; Voss JS; Brankley SM; Campion MB; Jenkins SM; Keeney ME; Henry MR; Kerr SM; Chaiteerakij R; Pestova EV; Clayton AC; Zhang J; Roberts LR; Gores GJ; Halling KC; Kipp BR
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Dec; 149(7):1813-1824.e1. PubMed ID: 26327129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Diagnostic Yield of Malignancy Comparing Cytology, FISH, and Molecular Analysis of Cell Free Cytology Brush Supernatant in Patients With Biliary Strictures Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography (ERC): A Prospective Study.
    Kushnir VM; Mullady DK; Das K; Lang G; Hollander TG; Murad FM; Jackson SA; Toney NA; Finkelstein SD; Edmundowicz SA
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2019 Oct; 53(9):686-692. PubMed ID: 30106834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness of rapid on-site evaluation specimens from endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for cancer gene panel testing: A retrospective study.
    Ishizawa T; Makino N; Matsuda A; Kakizaki Y; Kobayashi T; Ikeda C; Sugahara S; Tsunoda M; Ueno Y
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0228565. PubMed ID: 31999789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective randomised study of dense Infinity cytological brush versus regularly used brush in pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
    Kylänpää L; Boyd S; Ristimäki A; Lindström O; Udd M; Halttunen J
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016; 51(5):590-3. PubMed ID: 26642244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of Assessing the Number of Mutated KRAS, CDKN2A, TP53, and SMAD4 Genes Using a Targeted Deep Sequencing Assay as a Prognostic Biomarker for Pancreatic Cancer.
    Hayashi H; Kohno T; Ueno H; Hiraoka N; Kondo S; Saito M; Shimada Y; Ichikawa H; Kato M; Shibata T; Morizane C; Sakamoto Y; Shimada K; Komatsu Y; Sakamoto N; Okusaka T
    Pancreas; 2017 Mar; 46(3):335-340. PubMed ID: 28099251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration with fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in 104 patients with pancreatic mass.
    Ribeiro A; Peng J; Casas C; Fan YS
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1654-8. PubMed ID: 24628622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. UroVysion Multi-Target Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Assay for the Detection of Malignant Bile Duct Brushing Specimens: A Comparison with Routine Cytology.
    Zhai J
    Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 29734171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures.
    Ryan ME; Baldauf MC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):133-9. PubMed ID: 8013809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic performance of a stepwise cytological algorithm for biliary malignancy in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
    von Seth E; Ouchterlony H; Dobra K; Hjerpe A; Arnelo U; Haas S; Bergquist A
    Liver Int; 2019 Feb; 39(2):382-388. PubMed ID: 30507030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.