212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26597352)
41. Crowdsourcing Evaluation of Ureteroscopic Videos Using the Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale to Assess Ureteral Injury.
Kaler KS; Valley ZA; Bettir KC; Safiullah SM; Lama D; Yoon R; Landman J; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):275-281. PubMed ID: 29212372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The Surgical Learning Curve: Does Robotic Technical Skill Explain Differences in Operative Performance?
Bitner DP; Kutana S; Carsky K; Addison P; DeChario SP; Antonacci A; Mikhail D; Yatco E; Chung PJ; Filicori F
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 May; 33(5):471-479. PubMed ID: 36668994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills.
Goh AC; Goldfarb DW; Sander JC; Miles BJ; Dunkin BJ
J Urol; 2012 Jan; 187(1):247-52. PubMed ID: 22099993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Temporal variability of surgical technical skill perception in real robotic surgery.
Kelly JD; Nash M; Heller N; Lendvay TS; Kowalewski TM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Dec; 15(12):2101-2107. PubMed ID: 32860549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Validation of a novel robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy surgical training model.
Hung AJ; Ng CK; Patil MB; Zehnder P; Huang E; Aron M; Gill IS; Desai MM
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):870-4. PubMed ID: 22313582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Using AI and computer vision to analyze technical proficiency in robotic surgery.
Yang JH; Goodman ED; Dawes AJ; Gahagan JV; Esquivel MM; Liebert CA; Kin C; Yeung S; Gurland BH
Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):3010-3017. PubMed ID: 36536082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. How expert surgeons review robotic videos: A grounded theory study.
Soliman MM; Soliman MK
Am J Surg; 2023 Nov; 226(5):709-716. PubMed ID: 37558519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vargas MV; Moawad G; Denny K; Happ L; Misa NY; Margulies S; Opoku-Anane J; Abi Khalil E; Marfori C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28027975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Surgical Competency for Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy: Development and Validation of a Robotic Hysterectomy Assessment Score (RHAS).
Frederick PJ; Szender JB; Hussein AA; Kesterson JP; Shelton JA; Anderson TL; Barnabei VM; Guru K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 27780777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Performance of robotic simulated skills tasks is positively associated with clinical robotic surgical performance.
Aghazadeh MA; Mercado MA; Pan MM; Miles BJ; Goh AC
BJU Int; 2016 Sep; 118(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 27104883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Use of Main Renal Artery Clamping Predominates Over Minimal Clamping Techniques During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Complex Tumors.
Lieberman L; Barod R; Dalela D; Diaz-Insua M; Abaza R; Adshead J; Ahlawat R; Challacombe B; Dasgupta P; Gandaglia G; Moon DA; Novara G; Porpiglia F; Mottrie A; Bhandari M; Rogers C
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):149-152. PubMed ID: 27936928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Feasibility of expert and crowd-sourced review of intraoperative video for quality improvement of intracorporeal urinary diversion during robotic radical cystectomy.
Goldenberg MG; Nabhani J; Wallis CJD; Chopra S; Hung AJ; Schuckman A; Djaladat H; Daneshmand S; Desai MM; Aron M; Gill IS; Satkunasivam R
Can Urol Assoc J; 2017 Oct; 11(10):331-336. PubMed ID: 29382445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Validation of a Simulation Model for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
Tarr ME; Anderson-Montoya BL; Vilasagar S; Myers EM
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jan; 28(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 34149018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Concerns of Quality and Safety in Public Domain Surgical Education Videos: An Assessment of the Critical View of Safety in Frequently Used Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Videos.
Deal SB; Alseidi AA
J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Dec; 225(6):725-730. PubMed ID: 28882684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery.
Moglia A; Ferrari V; Morelli L; Ferrari M; Mosca F; Cuschieri A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1065-80. PubMed ID: 26433570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Is Off Clamp Always Beneficial During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy? A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Clamp Technique in Patients with Two Kidneys.
Rosen DC; Paulucci DJ; Abaza R; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Hemal AK; Badani KK
J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1176-1182. PubMed ID: 28954531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Surgery with objective performance indicators for the assessment of skill during robotic-assisted thoracic surgery.
Oh DS; Ershad M; Wee JO; Sancheti MS; D'Souza DM; Herrera LJ; Schumacher LY; Shields M; Brown K; Yousaf S; Lazar JF
Surgery; 2023 Dec; 174(6):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 37718171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Robotic partial nephrectomy with superselective versus main artery clamping: a retrospective comparison.
Desai MM; de Castro Abreu AL; Leslie S; Cai J; Huang EY; Lewandowski PM; Lee D; Dharmaraja A; Berger AK; Goh A; Ukimura O; Aron M; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):713-9. PubMed ID: 24486306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Intraoperative robotic-assisted low anterior rectal resection performance assessment using procedure-specific binary metrics and a global rating scale.
Gómez Ruiz M; Tou S; Gallagher AG; Cagigas Fernández C; Cristobal Poch L; Matzel KE
BJS Open; 2022 May; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 35543264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Crowdsourced assessment of surgical skills: A systematic review.
Olsen RG; Genét MF; Konge L; Bjerrum F
Am J Surg; 2022 Nov; 224(5):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 35961877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
